@Angrymum22the coach and her sibling are in NO position to help others with their track record of “success” are they?! Added to the compulsory strike off is the coach’s sibling’s unsuccessful claim of constructive unfair dismissal against her employer (also Yawn’s Coach’s employer) which Yawn’s coach was backing up all the way by adding her own fibs.
The tribunal judgement makes it clear that the legal professionals involved saw both of them as a pair of grifters with a pretend business. The sibling basically shot herself in the foot because her claim of severe mental health problems leading to months off work and eventual ending of her employment did not stand up when compared to her social media posts at the time. The posts were full of how great her and Coach’s life was, including Lives on the days she claimed to be unable to get out of bed. All of these lies were totally backed up by Coach which just shows the level of dishonesty that comes naturally to her and those who are attracted to her way of operating.
Attached is a quote from the [publicly available] judgement indicating just what the judge thought of this kind of grift (red line is redaction of Coach’s name, blue line is redaction of the biz name). Elsewhere in the judgement he/she is not complimentary about the pair of them as characters.