@Jane1284 I did promise I’ll share my second opinion when I receive it (as we have very sinker case but different protocols).
The clinic I approached for second opinion are based in new York (Centres for Human Reproduction) and have now diagnosed me with 'PREMATURE OVARIAN AGING (POA)’ based on all my blood tests and scans.
The main bits of the second opinion report are as follows:-
“This diagnosis was reached based on her LOW AMH LEVEL of 2.4 nmol /L, LOW ANTRAL COUNT and VERY LOW TOTAL TESTOSTERONE.
We would stimulate a POA patient with higher medication dosage. We also would NOT stimulate a woman with POA with a LONG AGONIST PROTOCOL because suppressing ovaries in women with already LOW FUNCTIONAL OVARIAN RESERVE makes little sense.”
Here’s my view on this:-
The good news - my current clinic are stimulating me with the highest dose of medication. So they are at least aligned on this bit.
The bad news - my current clinic are following the Long protocol whereas the clinic in New York are saying that it makes little sense to do so. @Jane1284 Sounds like you are on the right protocol so wanted to let you know so you have some comfort.
I had consultation with create clinic as well who were pushing for short protocol with medium dosage.
Believe it it not, I’m going to seek a 4th (and final) opinion. I’m doing this to make sure my next cycle is the correct protocol for my situation and not just putting my body through so much and wasting money on something that’s not right for me.
The research continues .... xxx