mosschops you obviously don't have a son who won't understand police spoken instructions as an adult. That's why I'm particularly interested in what ifs.
HMo2
"It was a mistake, just a mistake, and I think to call the poor officer who made that mistake, a murderer, is really silly. HE IS NOT A MURDERER. He was doing his job."
Yes the policeman who pulled the trigger was probably following order. But is not the mets job to shoot innocent people. When mistakes happen that lead to a death legally people can be held responsible for murder. It's unlikely that will happen in this case but it is possible for that to happen- the law allows for that.
This for example from the Sunday Times
"Two firearms officers are facing a murder investigation after being accused over the shooting of Harry Stanley in 1999. Stanley was shot by SO19 after he was seen carrying what officers judged to be a weapon but was in fact a table leg."
The HArry Stanley case keeps going backwards and forwards, to and from the courts- but point is it is entirely possible for a policeman to shoot someone on duty and be charged with murder. In the same way that is entirely possible for an incompetent doctor to be jailed. Neither scenario happens very often (and obviously shouldn't happen very often), but if people cock up they can be held accountable whoever they are.