"Apart from married middle-class women in full-time work, most women would prefer to look after their children and work only part-time if possible. Most women value home and family life above a career ? hardly surprisingly, since few women are offered careers and most must content themselves with jobs ? and, he argues, women with these domestic priorities feel increasingly that the femocracy of career women in power doesn?t speak for them"
I love the opening dismissal - 'apart from married middle class women in full time work ...'!
I can say with 100% certainty that I didn't want to be at home with my children. I found it tedious and it was not rewarding. I was not very good at it, and my nanny - who was trained in childcare - was infinitely superior at me in these arts.
I had, and still have, a career and it has always been important to me.
I'm lucky in that I have a partner who supports my right to this career and we have worked - together - to ensure that our children are loved, well cared for and that we can both work in careers that we find rewarding.
And why should that choice not be open to anyone?
Why should it feel that it's being forced on people?
That said, I am also of the view that if women want to be at home with their children - or, indeed, if men want this privilege - then we, as a civilised society, should be looking at ways that this choice can be available to all.