I have read the Indie piece, very interesting.
But I am struck by the thought that it is all about rehabilitation....and nothing about punishment.
I agree that 10 year olds who commit even horrific crimes should not be locked up forever, that they do need to be given the chance to change, that rehabilitation is important. But just because they were 10 when they committed the crimes, does this mean they can't be punished?
In which case, why do we (ie normal parents) all strive to find appropriate discipline measures for our kids, toddlers, teens? I think most normal parents know that bad behaviour needs to be sanctioned, not just accepted and the child incentivised with treats and carrots. I do punish my children for bad behaviour, I think it is pivotal to creating boundaries.
These kids are removed from violent, abusive home lives where poverty, alcoholism, drug taking, etc are all rife. They are given clean, warm accommodation and given clear boundaries. I would not see any of that as punishment, quite the reverse, they are being helped by being removed from their chaotic home environments.
They are then educated and incentivised with treats. All good.....
But nowhere does punishment come into it. Al I barking up the wrong tree by punishing my kids if the top shrinks don't believe it works?