Emily
So so sorryif I sound aggressive and scary - especially since this
"Emily
The yare State schools, paid for out of State money, provided by lots and lots of people who are not in the slightest bit convinced by your religion, and therefore these schools are - and should be - answerable to the State. It's a pity they exist at all but, if they must, then that's the way it has to be."
is the only comment I have ever addressed to you on Mumsnet and I cannot for the life of me see what I have said that is aggressive or scary. Unless it is the scary, aggressive, facts it contains?
Even if every single one of those faith schools had a roll of 600; and even if every single child in them was an only child with two parents; and even if every single child was sent there out of sincere religious conviction rather than through lack of choice, poor provision of non-denominational education, or just hard-headed cynicism about results, then that would still represent a minority of people in this country endorsing the beliefs of those schools. And I would say that it is obvious to even the most casual observer that those are all impossibly high estimates, especially as the vast majority of those schools will be primaries which have much lower rolls and which are much less likely to have children travelling long distances, so that attendance is much more about convenience than conviction.
What seems okay to you - or to me, come to that - is neither here nor there. These are state schools and so cannot be outside the very clear laws on what is and is not permissible in classrooms.