Demanding a ceasefire from Israel and not from Hamas, whilst ignoring the fact that Hamas continue to attack Israel, continue to hold hostages and continue to reject ceasefire terms doesn't make you pro-humanity, it makes you pro-Hamas. Obviously I want a ceasefire, everyone wants a ceasefire. This is not Israel bombarding a cowering nation who are vigorously waving a white flag and doing everything they can to save their people and achieve peace. This is a terrorist organisation with the sworn ambition of murdering all Jews, who have raped, murdered and tortured innocents including children, and who are still holding civilians hostage. They are still firing endless missiles at Israel and are refusing to release the hostages, despite knowing that if they release the hostages and surrender the terrorists, there will be peace. So why don't they? And why aren't you condemning them, why aren't your demands for ceasefire aimed squarely at Hamas when it's only them who can agree to it. The only way Israel can get a ceasefire is by agreeing to the terrorists' demands. Do you think they should? Hamas also always breaks ceasefires - what do you want Israel to do then, just let them carry on chucking bombs at them and not retaliate? Let them hop over the border every so often to do some raping and murdering??
A couple of days ago when Hamas realised Israelis were about to rescue six hostages, they shot them. For no reason. They weren't going to be of any 'use' to them dead, they could've let them go home. This is who you are defending when you insist it is all Israel's fault. You and I apparently have extremely different morals.
(FYI Israel is pausing the war to allow vaccinations for the Palestinians; can you think of any other time when a defender has agreed to pause retaliation so their attackers can get vaccinated?! Yeah, they're definitely the bad guys here!)
However, this thread is not the place for this discussion. It should have no relevance whatsoever to Jess Phillips' actions - unless you're suggesting it is acceptable that she was given preferential medical treatment because of her views...?