Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

A thread to discuss DEVELOPMENTS regarding Maddie McCann

1003 replies

jampot · 05/05/2007 14:03

We can discuss parenting styles in a few weeks

OP posts:
LucyJones · 05/05/2007 23:03

so in the mean time you'll all argue semantics amongst yourselves

GColdtimer · 05/05/2007 23:03

Exactly Aitch, and I am sorry wannabe but I think it is Goulish to speculate in the manner you have. There is a difference between discussing developments and the kind of speculation that says "I don't think there is going to be a positive outcome". Like we know for goodness sake.

wannaBeWhateverIWannaBe · 05/05/2007 23:05

agree totally aitch.

edam · 05/05/2007 23:05

Aitch, when you are dividing the thinkers and the emoters, do you define thinkers as 'people who are arguing about whether leaving kids on their own while you have dinner is OK'? And emoters as 'people who say this isn't the place to have a pop at the parents'?

Because if that's the case, I'm with the emoters, tbh.

AitchTwoOh · 05/05/2007 23:06

is it semantics? i don't think so. if you mean trivialities rather than the study of linguistics then i don't find this stuff trivial.

homemama · 05/05/2007 23:06

My post was trying to say,'why do we do this to each other?'
Before joining MN,I would honestly have thought that concern/empathy/discussion about a missing child would be one topic where we'd all be singing from the same hymn sheet.
Sure, some people are more emotive than others but do the 'feelers' and the 'thinkers' really feel so different about this?

homemama · 05/05/2007 23:08

Whatever feelers and thinkers are anyway? I'd like to think I was both!

wannaBeWhateverIWannaBe · 05/05/2007 23:08

but I'm not. and beaty said similar on the other thread I think, which I didn't post to because it had moved on to this one...

people speculate. no I don't think the police are giving all info, but I can't remember a case like this that's had a positive outcome, so unfortunately, no, I don't feel very hopeful that this one will. but it doesn't mean I don't want her to be found alive and well and reunited with her parents.

NKF · 05/05/2007 23:08

I've been exasperated by the notion that anyone who says they wouldn't leave their child in a hotel room while they went to eat is automatically assumed to be saying that the parents were negligent. You might not leave yours because you'd rather not. But you could be making that judgement for yourself without criticising someone for doing the opposite.

AitchTwoOh · 05/05/2007 23:08

i'm not sure where my line is, edam. i read the first thread and as it progressed and more info became available i didn't see so many people 'criticising' the parents. and it's a complete given that everyone wants the wee girl found safely. but i really do think it's all up for discussion, truly.

NKF · 05/05/2007 23:10

Ah, why do we do this to each other, Homemama? I don't know and I'm interested in why too.

AitchTwoOh · 05/05/2007 23:11

forget about the feelers and thinkers, homemamma, if you don't like it. it was just an interesting thought that gameboy, i think, had which might have begun the process of stopping everyone fighting.

AitchTwoOh · 05/05/2007 23:12

i think we're all interested in that, nkf.

are you a newbie, come on, tell...?

NKF · 05/05/2007 23:13

Newish. A week or so.

edam · 05/05/2007 23:13

I think it's a false proposition though, the thinkers/emoters one. As if anyone who says, hang on, isn't criticising the parents horribly unkind, is somehow applying insufficient critical rigour. I don't think there's anything particularly intellectual about having a go at the McCanns right now. Far from it.

wannaBeWhateverIWannaBe · 05/05/2007 23:14

so at what point is it appropriate to discuss it then? because it will be discussed, in the media, there will almost certainly be calls by some kneejerk radical to make it illegal to leave a child undupervised like that, but at what point is it appropriate? when she's found safe and well? and if she isn't? will it never be appropriate?

AitchTwoOh · 05/05/2007 23:15

but you're assuming that people were having a go at the mccanns, edam, and i really didn't interpret it like that. i wasn't on the thread becasue i haven't ever been on holiday with dd so it's never come up but i read it and didn't see it like that.

wannaBeWhateverIWannaBe · 05/05/2007 23:16

edam I don't think anyone had a particular go at the parents though. I know many asked why "a parent" would leave their child in a hotel room, and also people did ask why they didn't use baby listening, but I don't recall anyone saying they were negligent? but then I didn't read all the other thread ...

NKF · 05/05/2007 23:16

Edam,

Having a go at the McCanns right now would be shocking. But nobody has done that have they? Unless you think that to say you would have done something different is criticising.

Of course to say that you would have done something different isn't helping them. But let's not be vain here. Unless we are a member of their family, a close friend or on the police investigation, we're not in a position to help really.

edam · 05/05/2007 23:17

I'm not assuming people were having a go at the McCanns, it was there on the thread in black and white!

NKF · 05/05/2007 23:17

Sorry Edam, I missed it then.

AitchTwoOh · 05/05/2007 23:19

i read the thread... the overwhelming tone was not one of people having a go. as i recall a couple of people said, before many details came out, that they thought something odd was going on but that's all i saw.

GColdtimer · 05/05/2007 23:21

Yes, homemama, you would hope that everyone would be singing from the same hymn sheet and that is that we hope the little girl is returned safely to her parents and we, as parents empathise with what they are going through and wish there was something we could do. I am sure that when push comes to shove, that is exactly what everyone is thinking.

Thing is, there will always be people who speculate. There will always be people who make judgements or like to say what they would have done in than situation, there are people who want to be able to share what they are feeling with others and there are people who like to intellectualize everything. If you had such an eclectic group of friends round to dinner you probably would have the same kind of heated discussions and disagreements but most of us don't. Which is what makes MN so interesting and yet so frustrating at times.

I'm with you on this one, I really am.

wannaBeWhateverIWannaBe · 05/05/2007 23:21

likewise aitch, and I still think so. and I was one who questioned why the parents would leave the child, and why such apparently over protective parents would have dinner in a restaurant where they couldn't see their hotelroom and would turn down baby listening. it didn't make sense to me then and it still doesn't. but that doesn't mean I blame them for her disappearance.

and similarly I think rhubarb's post accusing people of being "smugly smothering" could be interpreted as being equally judgemental

edam · 05/05/2007 23:21

Oh come on, I don't want to cut and paste for obvious reasons but comparing the parents to drink drivers wasn't having a pop, for instance? There were several aggressive posts implying it was somehow the parents' fault.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.