O.K. I am back! A little bit worse for wear, I needed a stiff drink when I re-read the judgment so I am a bit squify, otherwise I would not be able to tell you the following.
This is taken directly from the judgment (of which I have a transcript). I was in two minds whether to post this. Believe me I am feeeling very squiffy and I could not post this if I was feeling sane! (Cheeseball, fingers have left me and I am struggling to press te right keys, but I think this is due to intoxication rather than sanity)
Oh god I think I am a bit drunk!!
The followng is taken from exactly what the judge said;
He came up with six points as to diagnose me as to whether I have MSBP, based on Prof. Meadows definition as to what MSBP is and as to whether I suffer from it.
Ooh dear I am a bit squiffy! Here goes;
1.Did the mother do something to harm the child?
2.Did the mother deliberately exacerbate or fabricate her own illness or that of the child?
3. Is she truthful or is there a degree of distortion or exageration of her own or her daughters medical condition?
4. Is she emotionally labile?
5. Is she attention seeking, manipulative and egocentric?
6. Is she prone to fantasies and deceptions?
"My findings to all these questions must be in the affirmative and therefore I find that the mother suffers from the personality disorder known as Munchausen-Syndrome-By-Proxy, as described by Dr Meadows"
Please could someone explain to me what a labile personality is?
I realise that this is just the judges decission with regard to me. In his summing up he critisized my husband for not being stronger and said that he had been 'wronged' by his wife and yet still found the necessity to stand by her, to the detriment of his children and must therefore be a weak man. My dh is anything but weak in both an emotional and physical way.
Perhaps this illustrates how the courts were taken in by the ss and the information that my 'step-monster' gave them just added to their decission that I was a bad mother. I do believe that even without my 'step-monsters' input I would have lost because they had already decided that I was a sufferer of MSBP prior to the court case and prof. Meadows report was written without meeting me or any of my doctors and he wrote his report 14 months before the wardships final hearing and he was not going to change his mind.
Oooh dear I think I need to lie down for a bit!!! I will be back to re-read what I am about to post and add to it if necessary. I am sorry but I needed something to enable me to read the judgment.
From a very squiffy Bunglie !!!