Child taken from womb? Truth into darkness....

[LakeDistrictBabe]

Ok, the old thread is nearly full. If you read the other three, I don't need to re-write everything again ;)

But you know I am referring to the case involving an Italian mother and the British social services.
Opinions welcome.

AY!!!!

Consider it compensation for the FUCKING HUGE telephone bill telecom Italia will be presenting me with in Jan.

(start collection of coins to help Carpe with her bill)

AY

I'll start a petition to nominate him for the "Berlusconi Award 2013". It is a very prestigious award

And you will all be happy to hear it comes with free Berlusconi.

I expect Essex council legals will be interested in an update too

Yoni: "You seem to have misunderstood mypoint re Haringey JH. I Was pointing out that they seemed to have increased their adoption rate by getting more adopters, not more children."

That only applies if these are children "languishing in care" rather than children newly taken into care. I have given a spreadsheet for a previous year which demonstrates that this was not the case then.

Obviously we don't know for certain as yet which children were adopted. It could be that for the first time in 12 or more years it is children actually "languishing in care", but I would be surprised.

We will have access to the stats about this in late 2014.

Mr hemming have you breached reporting restrictions?

scottishmummy

They were the first to get full details and the screen shots to prove it.

Well, second. The guardian actually had a real live person to man the phone in the evening.

But informing Essex LA was an absolute priority and was taken care of ASAP.

Jolly good,and with corroborating screenshots and evidence trail
Nice

How heartening it is to see an MP who ceaselessly fights for his constituents by wielding his sword of truth and trusty shield of British fair play on Mumsnet.

Truly, his posts have made the scales* fall from my eyes.

I do so hope his deeds will soon receive the recognition and reward he so richly deserves.

(*It's those bloody lizards again)

Well scottishmummy we all know the drill now.

You see, earlier in the thread, in his haste to try to prove a point, he sent a poster on the thread ....

A page from a court document, an onging case at that, which was not redacted

So that had to go to Essex too.

At this rate stuff covered by the offical secrets act is going to be all over mumsnet by teatime.

We may have to rename ourselves SpiesNetif John carries on his current preference for upping the ante in his "proof!" posting. Which could create a massive shift in the site's demographic.

scottishmummy
Jolly good,and with corroborating screenshots and evidence trail

Yep. As many others (I wonder why doesn't Mumsnet have a 'doh' smilie...)

Carpe
And you will all be happy to hear it comes with free Berlusconi.

Gosh, that seems a real threat. Even worse than sending him my dear Hobbits.

"Obviously we don't know for certain as yet which children were adopted"

obviously.
so why post the stats then ? if they dont prove anything?

Lake

The "free real live Berlusconi" with every Berlusconi award is a promise not a threat.

Despite getting away with murder in the judicial system for like...forever...he finally got his just desserts in the other important court for a politico. The court of public opinion.

He honestly thought that he had been an arse for so long he could do what he liked.

But, no. As it turned out the public got all with the straw that promptly broke the camel's back.

So we can finally be free of him for good.

I think he'd feel right at home living on Mr Hemming's mantlepiece next to the award.

Obviously we don't know for certain as yet which children were adopted. It could be that for the first time in 12 or more years it is children actually "languishing in care", but I would be surprised.

Oh God. So your point would be that the child snatchers are out to do some evil to get more children into adoption but...that is not the case...

(Aaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhh, Cries, shouts, throw herself down to the ground and madly tears her hair out from desperation)

Carpe
I think he'd feel right at home living on Mr Hemming's mantlepiece next to the award.

They would make great friends. We can suggest Hemm to adopt him and give him British nationality too.

cest

re

so why post the stats then ? if they dont prove anything?

HTH explain how things seem to work on this thread.

and give him British nationality too.

OK OK you win!

We'll send him to the north pole instead.

On the understanding that you stop encouraging certain members of your political mob to move over here.

Capiche ?

Carpe

On the understanding that you stop encouraging certain members of your political mob to move over here.

Oh well, he won't ever take my encouragement seriously, even if I use the Gandalf's stick to convince him.

Popping back in to say SSHITS has instituted a 'no platform' policy for John Hemmings, so I will no longer be posting on this thread. It has become a chance for him to twirl his self-declared maverick hero status in front of a hostile audience, loving the victim credibility it gives him.

Not that I deplore all your stalwart efforts to take the Sword of Truth to his inchoate ramblings, quite the contrary. I'd love to see Munby J. commit him for contempt. We can only hope.

Googled the acronym - through the first hundred, anyway - and the best I could get was Shared sanitation, hygiene information and tales

Sorry to be dim ill-informed, but actually do now want to know.
Just call me sad.

Angela

We salute SSHIT and fully comprehend their need for afementioned policy. We will be writing to you to that effect. Just as soon as we find a pencil and the paper with big lines on it.

WANKERs has insitiuted their own Hemming specific policy.

We are really bored now with going around in circles with what feels like Cartman channelled to the power of ten.

And we feel returning to Dante's lesser known circle of hell, ie trying to get John to debate rather than randomly state and then run off again ..... is being exploited by somebody to try and steer the conversation away from court orders that have been breeched on this thread.

So that is all we at WANKER are prepared to discuss. Well expcet for how pissed off we are at being lulled into a false sense of security by somebody about the public nature of the Italian extract. Because we are habouring something of a continent sized grudge. And muttering darkly.

We will prise the above into all and every post, even if it requires the world's largest shoehorn. In homage to the example set by our "elders and betters" on this thread.

We will of course be opposing the motion in our ranks to commence baking a cake +file.

HaveAFestiveLittleChristmas

We will be posting our associations full titles as soon as we have chekced for lizard people spies amoung us.

OK

WANKER

Is the ass. for We Are Not Keen on Evidence being Required.

I will allow IMPISH, CUNT and SSHIT to speak for their own ass.s

Becuase otherwise they may not let me write to them any ore. And if that happens, how can I tell people "I have written to IMPISH CUNTs & SSHIT" in order to clearly demonstrate my absolute rightness about everything ?

I am only a very occasional poster to this, mainly a lurker.

Can I say that it is not worth posters getting banned because of this.
It is possible to say whatever needs saying, but moderating the tone which is used. Thus saving being banned.
I have not noticed JH doing pas, but he might have been if I look back further.

I dont know the ins and outs of this and I realise it is very important stuff.

But is JH able to sort out the whole system?
Does he even have the ear of the prime minister and cabinet at all?
I read somewhere that it is easier for heads of industry to speak to the pm than it is for his own backbenchers.