Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

'Mumsnet hijacked by sex discussions' - Telegraph article, your views?

183 replies

RebeccaMumsnet · 22/10/2013 14:28

Hi all,

There is an article in The Telegraph today discussing the "risqué underbelly" of Mumsnet, and claiming that the site is "being hijacked by women looking to share steamy details of their private lives, leading to complaints from mothers looking for serious advice."

Justine has commented in the article, saying: "Happily it seems some mothers do still have time for their sex lives and we're pleased to provide a go-to destination for straight answers when you need to ask life's important but often embarrassing questions."

What are your thoughts on this?

OP posts:
Sparklingbrook · 22/10/2013 17:41

I didn't post on penis beaker or Yoni massage not because I am a big prude, just because they weren't amusing/entertaining.

I just did a Hmm and moved on.....

usualsuspect · 22/10/2013 17:42

MN has always had threads about sex.

If you don't like them, hide them.

It's not like the whole site is all about sex.

PigeonPie · 22/10/2013 17:43

I read the article this morning when I was supposed to be writing minutes and just thought '..,and' is there nothing else newsworthy? Although I would like to have been a fly on the wall when my aged father and long-time Torygraph reader read it.

What a lot of nonsense! My children are definitely past the nappy / sleepless night age but I still think MN is highly valuable for all sorts of things.

lifeissweet · 22/10/2013 17:44

My favourite bit about that article, by the way, is the picture.

That's exactly what I look like when I'm on MN. Wearing a vest top and giggling in an outraged way with my friend like some sort of sickening 'girly' sleepover. Yuck.

Sparklingbrook · 22/10/2013 17:45

They must have missed my riveting thread last week about getting hot candle wax out of a tablecloth.
Or they thought I was pouring it on DH's nether regions on the dining table in some disgraceful sex game.

usualsuspect · 22/10/2013 17:45

I've never used MN for advice on nappies or sleepless nights.

usualsuspect · 22/10/2013 17:47

They need to read the drunk thread if they want intelligent conversation.Grin

ArthurCucumber · 22/10/2013 17:48

"Hijacked"? No way. It's always been there, and this site is so huge that there's plenty of room for it. Sometimes I feel like cackling along and sometimes I don't, and I click on threads accordingly.

JugglingFromHereToThere · 22/10/2013 17:57

It is a very dichotomous comment isn't it ?

Hijacked by women (do we presume by default they aren't mothers ?)
wanting to share steamy details of their private lives (not so private then ? Implication that they should be ?)

Complaints (apparently? - to them? Confused) from mothers looking for serious advice (So, presumably that's not serious advice about sex or relationships then .... but about which puree to offer to your baby first or some such?)

Sparklingbrook · 22/10/2013 18:07

I found MN when the DC were 12 and 9. I missed all the birth/bf/weaning threads. Sad

I was straight in with 'OMG is anyone watching This Morning?' or some other important thread.

HeartsTrumpDiamonds · 22/10/2013 18:07

They keep saying the sex threads are HIDDEN, hidden shamefully and lasciviously away in amongst all the wholesome chat about breastfeeding and nappies.

FFS they're not hidden, they're right out there in the open. For all to see. No need to search them out. No need to hide anything or be ashamed.

I AM WOMAN. I LIKE SEX. ROAR.

Anniegetyourgun · 22/10/2013 18:07

I'm Joanne Baxter, and so is my wife.

HeartsTrumpDiamonds · 22/10/2013 18:07

They keep saying the sex threads are HIDDEN, hidden shamefully and lasciviously away in amongst all the wholesome chat about breastfeeding and nappies.

FFS they're not hidden, they're right out there in the open. For all to see. No need to search them out. No need to hide anything or be ashamed.

I AM WOMAN. I LIKE SEX. ROAR.

Feenie · 22/10/2013 18:08

Has anyone pointed out the DM have nicked this and Joanna Baxter's comment too.

This from the comments section at the bottom:

Isabel, London, United Kingdom, 13 minutes ago

I personally find mumsnet to be full of coarse women who talk about men and sex in a really unsavoury way. The half baked advise, obscene language and man-hating is unbelievable and woe betide anybody who disagrees with the general consensus. Small minded bullies with nothing better to do with their time. Then they all wonder why their husbands work late all the time.

Do we? Must have missed that memo.

Sparklingbrook · 22/10/2013 18:09

It's like 'Professor Layton Mumsnet' Hearts. Solve the puzzle and unlock the pervy outrageous shocking sex thread. Wink

usualsuspect · 22/10/2013 18:10

I don't use fucking obscene language.

What a cunt, Isabel sounds.

HeartsTrumpDiamonds · 22/10/2013 18:10

Oops sorry about the double post.

JoannaBaxterSaysSexIsRude · 22/10/2013 18:13

My recent threads have been about primary schools.

And maggots.

Grin

If maggots ever feature in a sex thread, I will flounce too.

Feenie · 22/10/2013 18:15

Dolly, walsall, moments ago

I've been thrown off mumsnet twice for daring to disagree with someone about how to safely use alternative medicine when your child's autistic. It's a horrible site. Full of horrible half crazy women. Maybe all this sex will cheer them all up a bit??

Yes, 'cos a difference of opinion gets you thrown off MN. Not repeated trolling or anything like that, oh no.

HeartsTrumpDiamonds · 22/10/2013 18:20

Sparkling arf

HeartsTrumpDiamonds · 22/10/2013 18:22

hi

tethersend · 22/10/2013 18:28

I think, in a way, we all have a little bit of Joanne Baxter inside of us.

BerryLellow · 22/10/2013 18:37

Joanna Baxter, for example, is a twat

ErrolTheDragon · 22/10/2013 18:46

There's a thread about Nutella at the moment, if anyone wants something truly close to our stomachs hearts.

PacificDogwood · 22/10/2013 18:59

Oooooh, Nutella
For use in the bedroom I presume?