Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

This woman should parp herself!

310 replies

monkeytrousers · 27/11/2005 14:33

parp!parp!parp!FGS!!

OP posts:
AnnieSG · 30/11/2005 09:53

Jingellbells, 'PMSL' just does not BEGIN to cover how much that made me laugh. But I do think Medea has a point. I loathe this woman's smugness and think she's downright warped to love her dh more than her kids. That's just plain wrong.
But on the other hand.......it does also challenge me a little on the 'getting any' front.
I just can't be arsed more often than not. And I do feel that isn't a good thing....

motherinferior · 30/11/2005 13:03

Oooh, look, have just re-read that first link of JackieNo's and her friend (one of those Mothers Who Think, as opposed to the rest of us bovine herd, presumably) refers to her as a "mother superior".

I rest my case.

NomDePlume · 30/11/2005 13:05
Caligyulea · 30/11/2005 13:06

Mothers who think? Isn't that an oxymoron, by these arsehole's standards?

NomDePlume · 30/11/2005 13:06

OH

MY

GOD

"His face softened and got all bleary, the way it does when we make love, right after he comes,..."

[vomit emoticon]

motherinferior · 30/11/2005 13:06

I'm actually more insulted by 'Mothers who think'. Yeah, right, the rest of us just shamble around dumbly, do we?

NomDePlume · 30/11/2005 13:07

I know I do, MI

motherinferior · 30/11/2005 13:08

You need more bleariness

wessexgirl · 30/11/2005 13:18

Gawd bless her for making me laugh on so many levels though. I suppose this wouldn't be eligible for a Bad Sex Award but if there were a Bad Infatuation Award it would have to be a contender.

brightstar1 · 30/11/2005 13:20

sorry can't read all threads.I had to stop reading article,was getting too angry!!!! I hope she never knows what its like to lose a child,We lost our 5yr old son and the love i have for my DH could never compensate for the pain i feel nothing can. sorry V.upset. maybe i misconstrude?

ruty · 30/11/2005 13:36

brightstar i'm so, so sorry. i like to think she wasn't as flippant as she appeared.

wessexgirl · 30/11/2005 13:47

Brightstar , of course I would not find this article funny in your position.

It can't be any comfort to you, but most of the thread has concentrated on how unbelievable people find her position and how badly written her justification of it is. Her point of view is unusual to say the least; there are a lot of comments in the thread which have made me laugh (rather than the article itself, which is just weird).

I can't speak for anyone else but I know that in your situation I would feel the same.

CliffRichardSucksEggsinHell · 30/11/2005 14:05

Brightstar, I wrote a strong letter to the newspaper complaining about this article, asking what the 'point' was supposed to be other than making us mums feel, once again, inferior. Perhaps you should write a letter explaining your point of view? This woman needs to know that what she has written is a pile of shite!

batters · 30/11/2005 15:17

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

batters · 30/11/2005 15:21

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

handlemecarefully · 30/11/2005 15:27

Brightstar - I'm so sorry

hatstand · 30/11/2005 15:37

I tried to read this article when mt first posted but couldn't get past the bit about her dh looking like he was about to come. Having seen the number of posts it's generated I though I ought to try again. As I got further on I started making a mental note of the spectacularly awful (as opposed to just plain awful) bits I was going to comment on. Lost count. Medea is absolutely right about this being force-feeding, I feel like a goose on a foie gras farm. The only reason it's worth getting to the end is to find out that should I ever decide to spend a couple of weekends knocking up a Mills and Boon I could - apparently - try sending my manuscript to Doubleday as well.

AnnieSG · 30/11/2005 16:06

Brightstar, so so very sorry to hear that. Best to ignore the silly woman.

monkeytrousers · 30/11/2005 21:41

Okay I?ve read that really long article now and I have a few issues.. I suppose Waldman?s essay shouldn?t really be taken out of context of being part of a wider collection of similar essays. It doesn?t stand up on it?s own though and should?ve stayed marginalized. It?s the Guardian editor who?s most at fault for publishing out of that context?probably.

But what about these corkers??

"This generation is more obsessed with their kids, for better or worse, and with parenting," said Camille Peri, author of one of the essays in "Because I Said So" ? are they? How do they know that?? I beg to differ!!

?On Oprah and beyond, Waldman tried to interpret what she meant about "bed death" -- that mothers lose themselves and their primary romantic relationship by focusing all their passion on their children.? I didn?t choose to do that, it just happened! And it doesn?t preclude any refocusing in future when the need, ahem, arises.

?So couldn't she just have said she loved him in a different way, not more? She thought about that, but rejected it. "We wouldn't even be here having this conversation," if she had, she said. "None of this would be happening."? Doesn?t that explain it then? She knew it?d get a response so she said it?

OP posts:
CarolinaMoon · 30/11/2005 21:46

yeah, MT, you're right about that last bit

kiskidee · 30/11/2005 22:05

I was musing yesterday that this woman will be on back on Oprah in 7 yrs time with said dh in the middle of an acrimonious divorce. Here is another sanctimonious fool who is currently in the same position. It is going to be the curse of Oprah or is it just that chickens always come home to roost.

I remember seeing this woman on Oprah yrs ago looking like the cat who ate the canary. Now she's got heartburn?

baka · 30/11/2005 22:24

Brightstar I think in your position the silly woman would find that actually she had been spouting a load of crap. She doesn't even realise what she has got- one of these people who need it to be spelled out to her. She probably will never know though as she'll sail through her perfect life with her pefect children and perfect husband. Put her out of your mind. Don't give her opinions a second thought.

christie1 · 30/11/2005 22:52

I actually read this essay before. It is found in a book called "Because I said so" by 2 US moms and journalists. The other essays are much better than this one which I found appalling. I didn't actually believe her, did you all note she and dh are high on ecstacy drugs during their weekend lovefests! I thought, hey, I could do that two if I were stoned out of my mind, or at least imagine that I had!

Caligyulea · 30/11/2005 23:42

What's interesting is that strain of sneering mysogyny that runs through all this "unthinking mothers" stuff as well.

And the lovely egotistical male idea that loving your children more than your partner shows that your romantic relationship is inadequate - well only very stupid people have that idea, don't they? Adults don't, not even adult men.

ruty · 01/12/2005 13:07

agree caligula.