To satisfy the curiousity of some posters - the reasons I home-ed my children are:
a) to allow them to learn at their own pace; to be able to spend as much time explaining a new concept as they need; to leave something they are not ready to learn until they are ready - rather than having to follow the 'average' pupil's learning trajectory, regardless of whether it bears any resemblance to their own.
b) to give them one-to-one attention and interaction, whether through conversation or activity, which a teacher, with 24-30 other children in her charge is simply unable (not unwilling) to provide for more than a couple of minutes per day.
c) to allow them to spend their formative years in an atmosphere relatively free from peer-pressure, allowing them time to develop the maturity necessary to enable them to make their own decisions.
To Scattyspice and others, who '...suspect psychomumma wants people to agree with her rather than help her examine her beliefs' - if you had bothered to read my OP, you might have noticed that I was enquiring whether any other H-Edder's had had similar experiences, and what had eventually transpired. I was not asking anyone to tell me what I should do, nor whether I was right in my decision.
Racmac: There's your name-check. If you had bothered to read my second post, your suggestion of a school trial-period was directly addressed.
Piscesmoon: Your juggling of double standards is impressive. As juule pointed out, you are outraged when a parent home-eds as a consequence of their 'feelings, beliefs or convenience', yet you ridicule the suggestion that a parent whose child would prefer to be HE'd should put that child's 'feelings, beliefs or convenience' before their own. You said early on that you 'don't think that one DC should be sacrificed for the family good.' Again, a 1-way street. You have made it clear that you'd think it ridiculously unreasonable for a parent to give up income/career/status just because one of their children preferred to be HE'd. But it's perfectly OK for the desire of 1 child to go to school to over-ride all other concerns of the rest of the family.
Why? Because school is the norm. But the 'norm' carries no more moral weight than any other option. Do you really think that the fact that more people do one thing than another means that one is more right than the other? This is precisely the sort of blind acceptance of peer-led behaviour that I don't want to embed my children in at a young age. I do not want them to do 'what other people do' for no better reason than that it is 'what other people do'.
Neither do I believe that my actions as parent of a 7 yr old girl (Aug birthday) should be dictated by what her subsequent opinion of me will be. Her response, when I've asked why she would like to go to school, has been 'Just because'. I may very well try your idea of getting another trusted adult to have a casual conversation with her, in the hope that she may be able to aticulate her reasons more clearly to someone else; believe it or not, I am interested in her opinion. However, I think I would be doing her a big dis-service to allow her 7-yr old 'feelings' to override her parents' judgement. We know her better than anyone else, and love her far more than the best-intentioned teacher in the world.
Sorry this is so long. And can someone tell me how to highlight other posters' names properly, please