I can understand why people get upset about this, but the reason why people choose not to vaccinate their children is fear.
Addressing them with aggression and contempt will not change that fear, but will entrench it further. There needs to be much more work done around engaging with vaccine refusers in a way that will make them more likely to see the benefits, and be able to put the risks of vaccinating into context.
I don't think it helps much that the medical profession seem unable to predict which children will react badly and which won't. The average GP will not be able to weigh up the risks to a child whose parents have certain more unusual medical conditions. I fall into this camp. I did vaccinate my child, but it was with some trepidation, based on my own medical history, not generic scaremongering. The HCPs I tried to get advice from either rushed to close me down, with a rather patronising manner, or had the honesty to admit their ignorance, but still had no answers for me. Nobody could quantify the actual risk for me.
I think it is also a problem that so many vaccines are bundled together, and that it is difficult or impossible to get separate vaccines to vaccinate across a longer schedule. It can also be a hard sell to persuade people they need to subject their child to a vaccination against an illness they have virtually no chance of catching, like polio. I understand the arguments for the bundling (my own DD has had all hers in the standard NHS schedule), but I wonder if the govt has taken the right tack in ploughing on with such a hard-line stance on this. I wonder if more would have had a measles vaccination, for example, if it was available separately.
It's a very thorny, but also a very important, issue. It deserves to be tackled in the most effective way, rather than be an occasion for insults and contempt.