Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

General election 2024

The Party of Women

189 replies

ThinWomansBrain · 23/06/2024 17:47

If you have a representative of "The Party of Women" standing in your constituency, give them a wide birth.
I had the misfortune to encounter a representative at the local hustings this afternoon. I'm about to put in a complaint to the police - several were present, but did nothing to intervene and stop the transphobic hate speech.
I's outrageous that they should be allowed to call themselves "The Party of Women" (presumably hoping to pick up votes by misleading people unto thinking they're The Women's Equality Party") they certainly don't speak for me.

This is the first thing in ages that I've seen as a potential red flag against PR.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
DrSpartacular · 23/06/2024 20:54

"For anyone not familiar with Kellie Jay Keen Minshull, she is permanently banned from mn for (amongst other things) saying that trans people should not be allowed to have children."

Are you sure that's the reason? I'm pretty sure it was not for that and was indeed for something much more tedious than you suggest?

ThinWomansBrain · 23/06/2024 20:55

What was said?

in response to Palestine/Gaza - all transwomen are liars and rapists
in response to homelessness in Islington - all transwomen are liars and rapists
in response to the need to support music & arts venues - all transwomen are liars and rapists
in response to how to support asylum seekers living in hotel in the constituency - all transwomen are liars and rapists

The candidate did say it was a one issue party - unfortunately the meeting was appallingly poorly chaired, which didn't help.

OP posts:
protectoroftherealm · 23/06/2024 20:59

I'll be voting for them. Catherine Briggs for Doncaster North. It'll be the useless Labour council that win as per usual but at least I'll have had my say.

BIossomtoes · 23/06/2024 21:00

protectoroftherealm · 23/06/2024 20:59

I'll be voting for them. Catherine Briggs for Doncaster North. It'll be the useless Labour council that win as per usual but at least I'll have had my say.

Councils aren’t up for election.

TheKeatingFive · 23/06/2024 21:00

ThinWomansBrain · 23/06/2024 20:55

What was said?

in response to Palestine/Gaza - all transwomen are liars and rapists
in response to homelessness in Islington - all transwomen are liars and rapists
in response to the need to support music & arts venues - all transwomen are liars and rapists
in response to how to support asylum seekers living in hotel in the constituency - all transwomen are liars and rapists

The candidate did say it was a one issue party - unfortunately the meeting was appallingly poorly chaired, which didn't help.

Well if this person genuinely said all TW are rapists, then that is appalling.

TiddlyFlaps · 23/06/2024 21:02

TheKeatingFive · 23/06/2024 20:51

For anyone not familiar with Kellie Jay Keen Minshull, she is permanently banned from mn for (amongst other things) saying that trans people should not be allowed to have children.

Well I know she's very anti-surrogacy, is that what you're actually referring to?

How does she propose to stop a TW and TM having a child together?

She literally said, in as many words, trans people should not be allowed to be parents.

There was a long history of deletions, suspensions and refusal to follow the site’s posting guidelines, but that one was pretty much the final straw, and a permanent ban followed.

You wouldn’t believe it from the fan-girling that goes on here, but KJK holds some very troubling and indisputably transphobic views. She’s just found different venues to give vent to them, and has a talent for drawing in superfans who will defend and excuse anything she says.

suggestionsplease1 · 23/06/2024 21:03

Underthinker · 23/06/2024 20:44

@suggestionsplease1
There's no hierarchy of discrimination in the equality act. Discrimination against protected beliefs is no better or worse than discrimination on the grounds of gender reassignment.

That may well be the case, but of course the expression of certain beliefs can cross over into hate speech at certain points eg. Abu Hamza, which is not protected in law.

This is very different from protected characteristics (eg. if someone becomes more disabled than they already are they do not lose that protection, if a woman has more children she does not lose protection)

protectoroftherealm · 23/06/2024 21:04

I'm aware of that! Probably poor wording. The Labour MP in my area is Ed Miliband and it will continue to be so. He will then parade out to disadvantaged areas with his band of supporters from the Labour Council with Ros Jones heading them up every few months and do precisely nothing!

TheKeatingFive · 23/06/2024 21:05

TiddlyFlaps · 23/06/2024 21:02

She literally said, in as many words, trans people should not be allowed to be parents.

There was a long history of deletions, suspensions and refusal to follow the site’s posting guidelines, but that one was pretty much the final straw, and a permanent ban followed.

You wouldn’t believe it from the fan-girling that goes on here, but KJK holds some very troubling and indisputably transphobic views. She’s just found different venues to give vent to them, and has a talent for drawing in superfans who will defend and excuse anything she says.

I never came across her on here, so I can't comment particularly, but how would you know what she was banned for? That's not public information surely?

spannasaurus · 23/06/2024 21:08

ThinWomansBrain · 23/06/2024 20:55

What was said?

in response to Palestine/Gaza - all transwomen are liars and rapists
in response to homelessness in Islington - all transwomen are liars and rapists
in response to the need to support music & arts venues - all transwomen are liars and rapists
in response to how to support asylum seekers living in hotel in the constituency - all transwomen are liars and rapists

The candidate did say it was a one issue party - unfortunately the meeting was appallingly poorly chaired, which didn't help.

Are you talking about Lesley Woodburn who is the POW candidate for Islington? Ive just listened to her answer about homelessness and that's not what she said

TuesdayWhistler · 23/06/2024 21:12

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

TiddlyFlaps · 23/06/2024 21:15

TheKeatingFive · 23/06/2024 21:05

I never came across her on here, so I can't comment particularly, but how would you know what she was banned for? That's not public information surely?

I was on the boards at the time, as many mners were, and there were many posts and threads as it was contentious in certain quarters

Her fans were very vocal trying to get her reinstated and she had shared with them the reasons she was given by mn, also across twitter etc - it wasn’t a secret.

Conveniently forgotten in the mists of time, isn’t it?

I do wonder how many of her current supporters, advocates and activists actually know the gory details from before she learnt how to stay just the right side of the line publicly.

The housing and employment discrimination chat was a rare slip of the mask.

MrsTerryPratchett · 23/06/2024 21:16

ThinWomansBrain · 23/06/2024 20:55

What was said?

in response to Palestine/Gaza - all transwomen are liars and rapists
in response to homelessness in Islington - all transwomen are liars and rapists
in response to the need to support music & arts venues - all transwomen are liars and rapists
in response to how to support asylum seekers living in hotel in the constituency - all transwomen are liars and rapists

The candidate did say it was a one issue party - unfortunately the meeting was appallingly poorly chaired, which didn't help.

Is it slander or libel when you knowingly misrepresent what someone says, I always forget which way round it is?

spannasaurus · 23/06/2024 21:17

MrsTerryPratchett · 23/06/2024 21:16

Is it slander or libel when you knowingly misrepresent what someone says, I always forget which way round it is?

I think libel when in writing

MrsTerryPratchett · 23/06/2024 21:21

Thanks @spannasaurus that's the chestnut.

suggestionsplease1 · 23/06/2024 21:32

Is it hate speech or incitement when someone incites prejudicial actions against a group or individuals on the basis of their membership in the group?

I can never remember which 🤔

MrsTerryPratchett · 23/06/2024 21:52

suggestionsplease1 · 23/06/2024 21:32

Is it hate speech or incitement when someone incites prejudicial actions against a group or individuals on the basis of their membership in the group?

I can never remember which 🤔

Do you think it's OK that women were missed out of the hate crime legislation? Because it does rather make it look like no one gives a shit about us.

FWIW I disagree with KJK on many things (including the employment and housing points), I often struggle with her tone and I'm sure we are polar opposites on many points. Many people are picking the least worst option to vote for. A party that hates and excludes women, or a party that hates and excludes some men? If you were a woman, which would you choose?

CaptainOliviaBenson · 23/06/2024 21:52

ThinWomansBrain · 23/06/2024 20:55

What was said?

in response to Palestine/Gaza - all transwomen are liars and rapists
in response to homelessness in Islington - all transwomen are liars and rapists
in response to the need to support music & arts venues - all transwomen are liars and rapists
in response to how to support asylum seekers living in hotel in the constituency - all transwomen are liars and rapists

The candidate did say it was a one issue party - unfortunately the meeting was appallingly poorly chaired, which didn't help.

I don't believe you.

Redshoeblueshoe · 23/06/2024 21:52

RaininSummer · 23/06/2024 20:38

Wish I had a POW candidate to vote for especially the marvelous Julia Long.

I would love to vote for Julia - she's brilliant

TheMiceOnTheMouseOrgan · 23/06/2024 21:53

MrsTerryPratchett · 23/06/2024 21:52

Do you think it's OK that women were missed out of the hate crime legislation? Because it does rather make it look like no one gives a shit about us.

FWIW I disagree with KJK on many things (including the employment and housing points), I often struggle with her tone and I'm sure we are polar opposites on many points. Many people are picking the least worst option to vote for. A party that hates and excludes women, or a party that hates and excludes some men? If you were a woman, which would you choose?

This

CaptainOliviaBenson · 23/06/2024 21:55

TiddlyFlaps · 23/06/2024 21:02

She literally said, in as many words, trans people should not be allowed to be parents.

There was a long history of deletions, suspensions and refusal to follow the site’s posting guidelines, but that one was pretty much the final straw, and a permanent ban followed.

You wouldn’t believe it from the fan-girling that goes on here, but KJK holds some very troubling and indisputably transphobic views. She’s just found different venues to give vent to them, and has a talent for drawing in superfans who will defend and excuse anything she says.

🐄💩

Underthinker · 23/06/2024 22:07

suggestionsplease1 · 23/06/2024 21:03

That may well be the case, but of course the expression of certain beliefs can cross over into hate speech at certain points eg. Abu Hamza, which is not protected in law.

This is very different from protected characteristics (eg. if someone becomes more disabled than they already are they do not lose that protection, if a woman has more children she does not lose protection)

Belief IS a protected characteristic.

suggestionsplease1 · 23/06/2024 22:15

MrsTerryPratchett · 23/06/2024 21:52

Do you think it's OK that women were missed out of the hate crime legislation? Because it does rather make it look like no one gives a shit about us.

FWIW I disagree with KJK on many things (including the employment and housing points), I often struggle with her tone and I'm sure we are polar opposites on many points. Many people are picking the least worst option to vote for. A party that hates and excludes women, or a party that hates and excludes some men? If you were a woman, which would you choose?

I am a woman, and a lesbian, and there is no way on this earth I would ever vote for Kelly Jay Keen.

She promotes a prejudice which I will be next in line for, make no mistake, because it stems from an underlying value system that believes discrimination can be appropriate. There will be others in the line of sight if she is emboldened through support.

Access to employment and housing are not trivial things and to advocate that they should be refused on the basis of trans status is abhorrent.

These statements can not be brushed aside; they are not little things, they are massive things and if she is successful in her appeal to employers and landlords she is setting trans people on a life trajectory of hardship, poverty and exclusion.

Not because of anything they have said or done, she has not qualified her statements, simply on the basis of trans status, simply because they are a member of that group.

That should be unconscionable to everyone.

TiddlyFlaps · 23/06/2024 22:23

MrsTerryPratchett · 23/06/2024 21:16

Is it slander or libel when you knowingly misrepresent what someone says, I always forget which way round it is?

You mean like when someone makes the provably false statement that “such and such political party hates and excludes women” to harm that party’s reputation?

If it’s in writing, that’s a libellous defamatory statement.

cariadlet · 23/06/2024 22:45

suggestionsplease1 · 23/06/2024 22:15

I am a woman, and a lesbian, and there is no way on this earth I would ever vote for Kelly Jay Keen.

She promotes a prejudice which I will be next in line for, make no mistake, because it stems from an underlying value system that believes discrimination can be appropriate. There will be others in the line of sight if she is emboldened through support.

Access to employment and housing are not trivial things and to advocate that they should be refused on the basis of trans status is abhorrent.

These statements can not be brushed aside; they are not little things, they are massive things and if she is successful in her appeal to employers and landlords she is setting trans people on a life trajectory of hardship, poverty and exclusion.

Not because of anything they have said or done, she has not qualified her statements, simply on the basis of trans status, simply because they are a member of that group.

That should be unconscionable to everyone.

Why on earth do you think Party of Women would come for lesbians next?

Some of the candidates - such as the wonderful Julia Long who has been mentioned several times on this thread - ARE lesbians.

I was at Standing For Women in Brighton today. I saw members of the "vulnerable, marginalised" trans community trying to silence women. I'll save my sympathy for the women that they were trying to intimidate.