Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

General election 2024

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Do you know people who will emigrate if labour win?

1000 replies

groyard · 24/05/2024 12:24

This is making me all very stressed. Trying not to freak myself out over future socio-economic ramifications for the UK if there is a wider trend of “brain drain”.

Brother and BIL have both said that if Labour win they will be emigrating with their wives and children.

I’ve heard similar sentiment from others but assume (hope) this is hyperbole.

Just to say, none of the people mentioned are wealthy but just about comfortable. Both highly skilled and in demand internationally.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
29
BitOutOfPractice · 24/05/2024 21:55

Late to the party but this, this one quote is basically the reason I’d vote Labour a million times over. From someone who’d leave to avoid the tax because they’re in “the top 0.1%”

“We'd keep a little flat here”

D’you know what? These are the arseholes I’d go to Heathrow to wave off.

the tone deaf, unflinchingly awfulness of this kind of post makes me utterly, uttterly despair.

Hdkatznahtw125sgh · 24/05/2024 21:56

GivePeaceAChance · 24/05/2024 21:45

I do know some Universities have increased Medicine numbers, Exeter for example, but only recently
So yes agree, this could have been implemented a long time ago.

Increasing medical students without addressing the training bottleneck has actually just resulted in more doctors who can’t get jobs and leave.

I am not a doctor, I am a nurse but reforming the career track so that it doesn’t involve moving up and down the UK every 6 months to 3 years and having more training places, especially at ST3-7/8 and introducing / changing training so doctors apply to train as an anaesthetist for example after FY2 or CF then they train as an anaesthetist, not 2 or 3 years then reapplying potentially having a gap, then doing another few years training that could be in a different UK nation.

A restorative payrise for all doctors would also help. Restorative is at least 30% whether society wants to accept this or not.

A clearer definition of doctors roles instead of churning out all these roles supposed to be a half doctor or a doctor on the cheap.

Making accelerated medical degrees for graduates much more accessible so that people don’t end up in roles that are muddying the waters.

Funding all nhs roles better, so that doctors (and everyone else) aren’t having to do a bit of everyone’s job.

These are a few things I know would be likely to help, and as I say I am not a doctor who I’m sure can add many more to this list.

Notonthestairs · 24/05/2024 21:58

"Increasing medical students without addressing the training bottleneck has actually just resulted in more doctors who can’t get jobs and leave. "

Yup.

Papyrophile · 24/05/2024 21:59

The engineering side of it will probably be replaced by AI too, if not entirely then largely as many things will be.

I don't like pissing on anyone's parade, but the engineering side of life depends largely on burly blokes with big tools who know exactly where and how to tackle a complex misbehaving machine. Trust me, my DH works on nuclear submarines with 80 strong crews that dont see daylight for months at a time. If they were to fail to get it right, people would die.

So no, I do not see AI replacing either the muscle or the conscience. The world is still PHYSICAL. You can't change that reality.

Hippee · 24/05/2024 22:03

DressDilemma · 24/05/2024 12:34

We have started thinking about it. Two of our friends have already set things in motion. One is a GP and is moving to Australia and the other one is moving to Canada. It is making us rethink our long term plans in UK. We are already paying 45% tax Applying private school fees VAT and high possibility of further taxation is very disincentivising.

Good luck to them then. Apparently it's almost impossible to get a GP in some parts of Canada. My friend's daughter has just been over and she has been raving about the quality of the food in the UK compared to Canada.

pizzaHeart · 24/05/2024 22:04

InterIgnis · 24/05/2024 13:16

If you have skills that are in demand, and wealth, emigrating isn’t difficult tbh. There are many countries actively trying to attract capital.

But it’s nothing to do with who is going to win GE. Tbh it’s most often about the weather.

Delphiniumandlupins · 24/05/2024 22:10

I don't know any. However, from everything I've read on MN, it would be good if some people do emigrate rather than overburdening state schools with their children when they can no longer afford private school fees.

Quirkyme · 24/05/2024 22:14

Delphiniumandlupins · 24/05/2024 22:10

I don't know any. However, from everything I've read on MN, it would be good if some people do emigrate rather than overburdening state schools with their children when they can no longer afford private school fees.

Oooooof 🤣🤣

Papyrophile · 24/05/2024 22:19

HowardTJMoon · 24/05/2024 20:45

There's always going to be someone new who wants to start a business and get other people to do the work for them. That these people get rich then inevitably fuck off to another country where there are bigger tax breaks is nothing new.

But sometimes, they have new ideas. Sometimes, very occasionally, they get big.

Resenting someone who has a better idea than yours is a hiding to extinction. Every business requires both thinkers and doers. The thinker gets paid better than the doer. Lots of people can be told what to do. Intelligence is not equally distributed.

Referencing another thread, about selective education and paying prep school fees. You may dislike me pointing out that it is primarily highly intelligent parents in well paid occupations who think that private education and schools are worth paying for. If they were not intelligent enough to earn enough to pay the fees, then their kids would be in the top sets of the underperforming comp and getting the social points. Intelligence is largely an inherited quality.

Nanaof1 · 24/05/2024 22:20

MissTrip82 · 24/05/2024 12:36

There are always people who say this at every election and they don’t tend to go anywhere.

In any event I’m not sure what you’re describing would constitute a ‘brain drain’………quite the opposite, I imagine.

They do the same here in the states. Yet, no one leaves. sigh

marmaladeandpeanutbutter · 24/05/2024 22:27

🤣🤣🤣

DodoTired · 24/05/2024 22:34

BitOutOfPractice · 24/05/2024 21:55

Late to the party but this, this one quote is basically the reason I’d vote Labour a million times over. From someone who’d leave to avoid the tax because they’re in “the top 0.1%”

“We'd keep a little flat here”

D’you know what? These are the arseholes I’d go to Heathrow to wave off.

the tone deaf, unflinchingly awfulness of this kind of post makes me utterly, uttterly despair.

whats so utterly awful about that? Except your jealousy? Please explain, I genuinely don’t understand

DodoTired · 24/05/2024 22:39

Delphiniumandlupins · 24/05/2024 22:10

I don't know any. However, from everything I've read on MN, it would be good if some people do emigrate rather than overburdening state schools with their children when they can no longer afford private school fees.

At least they pay enough taxes to actually cover their keep in state schools 🙄
unlike half of the population
if anything, they deserve place in state school more than someone else

Papyrophile · 24/05/2024 22:40

I didn't think I had illusions left for shattering. The sheer nastiness being shown here is strengthening my desire to leave the country by the minute. And yes, I can find other countries to live in, even in Europe.

BlueJamSandwich · 24/05/2024 22:42

GivePeaceAChance · 24/05/2024 21:32

no one said some high earners don’t rely on their employees to make their vast wealth but thats all irrelevant in pure financial terms because

The point is
If those who pay in more than they take out bugger off to another country that leaves those who benefit from those taxes and ni payments with a smaller purse to spread around.

Edited

That's never happened anywhere though has it, not on an International level? We've seen it here Nationally, where high earners left cities to live in the countryside post covid, but we've never seen a mass exodus abroad because of taxation.

As for "paying in more than they take out", the income of the top 1% is greater than the bottom 55%, they should pay more tax.

We're also a currency issuing country, so spending on resources to the economy and education, healthcare and infrastructure don't really need to be funded by revenue. E.g. every £1 spent on education is estimated to result in a £3 boost the the economy.

Plantbasting · 24/05/2024 22:49

5128gap · 24/05/2024 12:31

No. But I wouldn't worry too much about it. There's plenty of people with tremendous potential who never get the chance to be in the top positions because of gatekeeping and barriers caused by nepotism, inherited wealth, and all manner of other advantages gained through accidents of birth, without which many would actually be rather mediocre. If all these people emigrate they will create space for other people to rise and shine. So bon voyage and leave the ladder down behind you is what I say!

Oh this!

peanutbuttertoasty · 24/05/2024 22:50

Yes.

GivePeaceAChance · 24/05/2024 22:51

BlueJamSandwich · 24/05/2024 22:42

That's never happened anywhere though has it, not on an International level? We've seen it here Nationally, where high earners left cities to live in the countryside post covid, but we've never seen a mass exodus abroad because of taxation.

As for "paying in more than they take out", the income of the top 1% is greater than the bottom 55%, they should pay more tax.

We're also a currency issuing country, so spending on resources to the economy and education, healthcare and infrastructure don't really need to be funded by revenue. E.g. every £1 spent on education is estimated to result in a £3 boost the the economy.

Whether it’s ever happened is irrelevant, never say never, …..look at Brexit😳😳😳 who’d have thought this country would think that was a good idea.

Did I say anything about the fareness of the tax system.
No.

If the countries finances were so simple we wouldn’t have a problem.

The country relies on net providers to pay into the system…….less net providers = less money to spend.

Kandalama · 24/05/2024 22:53

Papyrophile · 24/05/2024 22:40

I didn't think I had illusions left for shattering. The sheer nastiness being shown here is strengthening my desire to leave the country by the minute. And yes, I can find other countries to live in, even in Europe.

It’s a big problem here. Divide and rule governing.

There are many countries that don’t have these sort of issues.

Cesarina · 24/05/2024 22:55

DodoTired · 24/05/2024 22:34

whats so utterly awful about that? Except your jealousy? Please explain, I genuinely don’t understand

@DodoTired
Presumably @BitOutOfPractice means that people who say they will leave the UK to avoid any extra/higher taxation, but will "keep a little flat here", would be actively contrbuting to the housing crisis by owning a flat in the UK which would be empty most of the time? 🤷‍♀️

GivePeaceAChance · 24/05/2024 22:57

DodoTired · 24/05/2024 22:34

whats so utterly awful about that? Except your jealousy? Please explain, I genuinely don’t understand

Agree that is a disgusting post!

pinkzebra02 · 24/05/2024 22:57

GivePeaceAChance · 24/05/2024 22:51

Whether it’s ever happened is irrelevant, never say never, …..look at Brexit😳😳😳 who’d have thought this country would think that was a good idea.

Did I say anything about the fareness of the tax system.
No.

If the countries finances were so simple we wouldn’t have a problem.

The country relies on net providers to pay into the system…….less net providers = less money to spend.

You seem to think these net providers are the sole and only source of this wealth as if it springs directly from the cracks of their arses, do you not think that if they were to leave, there's be plenty of others to take their places and happily pay their share to live in a decent, safe and fairer society? There's nothing special about net providers, as shocking as it may come to some. They are usually in highly competitive roles meaning there are many people competing for the same.
The roles that are harder to fill are actually the key workers low skilled, you know, the ones where you have to pull a finger put and font get allowed to stay at home should there be a global pandemic. Just because they aren't paid large sums of money doesn't mean they don't contribute to society. Do you think the only contribution people make is pure money? I would say that there's plenty mkre ways to contribute, such as actually providing services that benefit society like teachers and health care workers, even the people who remove your bins contribute more of value than some top earners. What's the use of sitting on a pile of money if no one will remove your waste?

Kandalama · 24/05/2024 23:01

Cesarina · 24/05/2024 22:55

@DodoTired
Presumably @BitOutOfPractice means that people who say they will leave the UK to avoid any extra/higher taxation, but will "keep a little flat here", would be actively contrbuting to the housing crisis by owning a flat in the UK which would be empty most of the time? 🤷‍♀️

I agree that’s probably what they are eluding to. However

Rather than make this hateful post why not ask the PP if they intend to let their kids live in it or rent it!
Or ask why they need it at the very least. But no. Pile on with a horrible remark.
Mumsnet is about discussion!

GivePeaceAChance · 24/05/2024 23:03

Plantbasting · 24/05/2024 22:49

Oh this!

🤯😳🤣🤯😳🤣

such blatant discrimination on this thread

GivePeaceAChance · 24/05/2024 23:08

pinkzebra02 · 24/05/2024 22:57

You seem to think these net providers are the sole and only source of this wealth as if it springs directly from the cracks of their arses, do you not think that if they were to leave, there's be plenty of others to take their places and happily pay their share to live in a decent, safe and fairer society? There's nothing special about net providers, as shocking as it may come to some. They are usually in highly competitive roles meaning there are many people competing for the same.
The roles that are harder to fill are actually the key workers low skilled, you know, the ones where you have to pull a finger put and font get allowed to stay at home should there be a global pandemic. Just because they aren't paid large sums of money doesn't mean they don't contribute to society. Do you think the only contribution people make is pure money? I would say that there's plenty mkre ways to contribute, such as actually providing services that benefit society like teachers and health care workers, even the people who remove your bins contribute more of value than some top earners. What's the use of sitting on a pile of money if no one will remove your waste?

No of course not and tbh this is often mentioned as a but…..
Of course
Many lower earners help run this country and we couldn't cope without them.
I’m thinking home carers for example. Without them their relatives quality of life would be severely diminished but their carers wage is a pittance.
Thats just one example.

Im fully aware a country runs on more than money.
But that doesn’t mean that our country can survive on less.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.