A lot of this seems very reasonable to me. (1) and (2) certainly. In particular (1) harms men and women. Porn is bad for everyone except the people profiting from it. One issue I see with reducing entry of girls into porn is that this is the kind of restriction that a more patriarchal society would tend to enforce. It is hard to see how we can reduce this without also reducing the right for women to choose how to lead their lives. Some clearly enter the industry voluntarily, albeit often because they are very desperate or confused.
(2) Yes self-ID in sports is absolutely preposterous.
(3, 4 + 5) I probably don't know enough to have an opinion on these. I would say, though, that it strikes me there is a very big difference between, say Trump and Epstein.
(7) well certainly it would be good to see birthing given more attention by the medical profession. We actually had our child in Japan where the situation is in many respects a lot better, particularly if you go down the natural route.
(6) Now this is the one where I have heard some persuasive counter-arguments. Some would say that the earning differences are the result of life choices, and that the hourly pay for the same work by men and women has no significant difference. I am sure you have all no doubt heard this rebuttal before but would be interested to hear views.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. These goals are tangible and make a lot of sense to me.