Yes 0ttile, it was an interesting, if difficult watch. I would ask about the cake. If DD would like her usual one I'd go with that. I have to remind myself, what would make me happy isn't alway in line with what makes DS1 happy. For him happiness comes from the familiar even though I would think it was too everyday.
Zoo It's highly unlikely the draft is a legal. It needs going through with a fine tooth comb.
It must be detailed, specific and quantified, otherwise it is worthless. No woolly phrases like 'access to,' 'would benefit from' or 'equivalent to.' For example, small class size needs quantifying. How many exactly? And staff trained in anxiety, what staff (TA/1:1/Class teacher/SALT...)? What training? What intervention will they be delivering? How often? How long for? Who will design the intervention?
Are SALT, OT, ELSA and some kind of MH therapy (probably CBT) in section F? And the recommendations from the EP?
It is important things like SaLT, OT, MH therapy go into F and a specific and quantified because it is then a) enforceable and b) appealable.
All DS' SEN needs should be in section B and every need should have corresponding provision in F and an outcome in E.
SOS SEN check drafts, which would be well worth doing.
This from IPSEA is also helpful.
DS' wanted to make pizza tonight. So they did. I told them I wouldn't do anything other than help with the oven. Unfortunately I did have to backtrack on that. I stepped in when I thought DS3 was going to lose his fingers chopping peppers, onion and mushrooms. I did some and we did some hand over hand. DH also restacked the dishwasher. Baby steps.