AuldAlliance
Hence my exasperation at the feeling that communicating with you resembles banging one's head against a brick wall. Which I expressed in non-hysterical terms.
Head. Brick wall. Bang. Bang. Bang.
Seems quite OTT to me. 
I suggested that the proposal to introduce voter ID will most likely deprive some voters of their rights, as the UK has no free form of photo ID.
You posted;
Making voter ID mandatory without making it possible to obtain any form of free ID...Especially in a country where a passport costs £75-85, and a driving test alone (theory & practical) is £85.
The current gvmt has proposed that photo ID should be mandatory when voting, despite the fact that all forms of photo ID are subject to a high fee.
All forms of photo ID are not subject to a high fee.
You finally engaged, by stating that denying the right to peaceful protest doesn't trouble you because you don't like Extinction Rebellion causing obstructions and megaphone guy was "annoying".
You are putting words in my mouth. I gave two examples of where the new bill might be useful:
"preventing Extinction Rebellion causing complete havoc in London" - which most ordinary Londoners would agree with, I'm certain. And 'the shouty guy' - who interrupted every BBC news broadcast outside parliament for months on end.
I also posted; "Let's wait and see" - I don't know if it will trouble me or not yet.