Seeing talk that Extinction Rebellion have had right to protest ended by police tonight on twitter
Sian Berry @sianberry
The Met appears to have extended its Section 14 order against protests to all of London, not just the whole city except Trafalgar Square. How can they justify this? Why has the GLA not kept the square (that they run) open for @XRLondon as before? @MayorofLondon @metpoliceuk?
We all have a right to peaceful protest - a blanket ban across a whole city would not respect that right in any way. The Public Order Act is meant to be used in a balanced, proportionate way, and this is not that at all.
More on the serious disorder the Act is supposed to be used for.
Jan Doerfel Chambers @chambersofJD
Section 14(1) of the Public Order Act 1986 provides:
(1)If the senior police officer, having regard to the time or place at which& the circumstances in which any public assembly is being held .. reasonably believes that—
(a)it may result in serious public disorder, serious damage to property or serious disruption to the life of the community, or
(b)the purpose of the persons organising it is the intimidation of others with a view to compelling..
..them not to do an act they have a right to do, or to do an act they have a right not to do,he may give directions imposing on the persons organising or taking part in the assembly such conditions as...
.....to the place at which the assembly may be (or continue to be) held, its maximum duration, or the maximum number of persons who may constitute it, as appear to him necessary to prevent....
....such disorder, damage, disruption or intimidation." This means the police have to show a reasonable belief in "serious public disorder","serious property damage" or 'serious disruption to the life of the community'' or that the purpose is serious intimidation by theORGANISERS
....(not just people present there). Sitting peacefully at Trafalgar Square (which we observed) does not justify a reasonable belief that this would occur
Lots to unpack here...