Why the rightwing push for no deal
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/13/brexit-fanatics-no-compromise-go-for-broke-chaos-counter-revolution
... a no-deal Brexit, or one that cuts British business off from its largest market, will destroy the Tories’ unearned reputation for economic competence
and further alienate the young and the professional middle classes whose votes the Conservative party will need one day.
A people’s vote, a Labour government with Marxists at the top, a threat to the union – everything conservatives once abhorred – are being brought closer by the tactics of the Conservative right.
You can understand their determination to push Brexit to the limits only when you grasp that, to its promoters,
Brexit is the best and only chance they have to launch a counter-revolution.
< incl against the Welfare State that Attlee brought in from 1946 and all the EU protections later >
They have hardly made a secret of their ambitions to reverse protections for workers
"The weight of employment regulation is now backbreaking: the collective redundancies directive, the atypical workers directive, the working time directive and a thousand more,” said Johnson in 2014.
Liam Fox told the Financial Times in 2012 it was “unsustainable to believe that workplace rights should remain untouchable”.
Jacob Rees-Mogg said he could not “support all the employment rights that come from Europe”.
David Davis, John Redwood and the older Brexit crew were against the social chapter from the moment of its inception.
Meanwhile, Andrea Leadsom outbid them all when
she dreamed of a future when there was “absolutely no regulation whatsoever – no minimum wage, no maternity or paternity rights, no unfair dismissal rights, no pension rights^^
– for the smallest companies that are trying to get off the ground”.
Leaving the EU can make their dreams come true
< and the nightmares of many others >
It was a howl of rage from Thatcherites, who cannot accept that their ideology failed,
from the old against the young,
and from all who could not make their peace with the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the environment science of the 1980s and the multiculturalism of the 2000s.
Their leaders see the chance to abolish a modern world they neither like nor comprehend.
Hence their fanaticism.
Hence their determination to go for broke and tolerate no compromises.