BigChoc, it was something I found out about recently too.
DH's condensing comment was along the lines of 'where did you hear this hysterical bollocks from' this time, especially when I said that it lead to cannilabilism.
When I explained where I'd heard about it (non-political avenue) and gave him the info about where, who, when and information that backed up my point about cannibalism being a direct consequence of a man made famine that was completely unnecessary he did (eventually) STFU and admit his ignorance.
But I resent his attitude that he gave me first.
Right now we have people on another thread, literally arguing that man made moves which might result in rationing (or worse) are acceptable in the name of long term political ambitions.
The idea that we are immune from acts of great self harm or destruction to ourselves or our fellow citizens because we are British is crap or because of a lack of historical knowledge.
I don't expect holodomor outcomes by any stretch of the imagination, but if rationing is a reality then the consequences will not be benign to many either.
I found DH's attitude more depressing than his lack of knowledge to be honest. History and politics are my bag. He's good at it, but he doesn't have the background or interest I do. Yet of course he knows best.
I'm still fuming.
And yes, I believe the word holodomor is a modern name which is supposed to try and put the famines into the public consciousness and awareness in the same way as the holocaust as a warning to never allow it to happen again.
There have been attempts to get it catagorised as a genocide but this has been blocked. Make of that what you will by looking at who and why its been blocked...