What nonsense. There has to be an element of compromise.
Sovereign nations only compromise when it suits them to do so. The EU forces us to submit - not even comprise, submit to its demands.
Just because the UK has not got its way on 55 occasions in the last 20 years doesn't mean other countries are making our decisions for us.
In other words, just because your elected Government has been over-ruled 55 times by an unelected undemocratic superstate that you cannot vote out of office, it doesn't mean the Uk is in in full control of its own destiny. 
Which of course is EUrophile nonsense.
Pooling sovereignty on certain issues involved a certain amount of compromise.
Pooling sovereignty voluntarily to the benefit of your country and its citizens is very different to submitting yourself to EU law, directives and regulations. Countries that allow that are no longer sovereign.
Why should voters in Surrey get to decide on behalf of people in Doncaster? It's the same thing, only on a bigger scale.
That is a calumny. It is not even worth starting to explain how wrong that it is.