Lurked, you say - When I go back to my native North East I see large levels of unemployment in the indiginous population, but that is the way it has been for decades, I see factories that are now able to produce at the rate they should have been able to all along because they now have staff that are willing to work. I know business owners, who for years couldn't recruit enough people to work at full capacty, an owner of a bus company who couldn't recruit drivers because it invoilved some early morning and late night (but a good rate of pay). All of them now do because they empoy migrants. I know people in the hospitality industry who fear for the future if we brexit.
I am an employer and I too benefit from the Free Movement of People. I can find super competent educated 30 year olds willing to work in the South East for the minimum wage. That is good for me. If all the talented Europeans were not here I would have to pay more. I would also have to hire younger, "locals" who I would have to train in customer service. The bus company above would have to do the same. So would the people you know in the hospitality industry. Wages would have to go up and our dividends would go down. Can you not see how all this might have an impact on job opportunities and wages for what you call the "indigenous population"?
These are the pros and cons of the Free Movement of People. The pros are mostly for employers, of course they are.
However, even as an employer I am still voting Leave.
I think the sovereignty issue is far more important than anything else.
(And after Brexit we could allow plentiful migration or even Free Movement if we want to - which we probably will. But we could allow it from other countries too. I would like to recruit someone from Japan, for example, but it is proving very difficult.)