" NO, thats rubbish, no, thats the Mail shock he has left his job he cant comment, he was x so he cant comment, he wants to leave and he is in the mail, so he cant comment, that article is rubbish because the man who owns the paper is bla"
Yeah, well of course when the security issue is raised by a former head of MI6 and the current heads of Europol and GCHQ say different, yes its ok to challenge.
The Mail is fine to challenge because of the vested interests of the owners ( a tax dodging inherited non dom whose Grandfather agreed with Hitler and a newspaper which once wrote about a "Jewish influx" from Germany in the 1930s)
You disagree with facts? What the hell are we supposed to base our arguments on?
" If it could deal with problems, in a confident, smooth, and UNITED way, we wouldn't be here would we? There would be no case for Brexit!"
Make your case for Brexit then. Democracy? No, easy to dismiss with facts. Better for the UK economy? No easy to dismiss with facts.
Sorry, what a crock, I agree that the EU could work better if there was reform, outside we have no way to drive this, outside we'll sign similar deals to Norway, Switzerland and Iceland where we contribute, obey regulations and have no say.
"with the threat of ISIS and the Refugee crisis, Europe is NOT safe"
Excellent conflation of issues, refugees will come here anyway ( we take less than our other major EU countries BTW), ISIS? Yes we are not going to make ourselves a target by bombing Syria.
Tell me why its not working? Tell me what will be different after? You can't, won't but you'll still refer to the same faulty rhetoric. Utter dribble.