Some women of that generation (and younger) enjoy being “looked after” by a man and when they aren’t they struggle to cope. I think most people, male or female, want some sort of "looking after" - someone bringing them a cup of tea if they are feeling down, someone to share a worry with, someone who'll say "why don't you have a paracetamol for that headache". I don't see there's anything wrong with the need, and it's well documented that life expectancy is increased if you're living together "that mole on your back looks dodgy, and a lot bigger than it was - I think you should get the GP to check it".
But you can't demand that someone else cares for you. You can buy a facsimile of caring, but the care you gave to your children wasn't a payment in advance for care in your old age.
Arse is right that the need increases as you get older, your own capability decreases, and the world becomes a more difficult place to negotiate.
I cannot think of anything worse than relying on someone. For me, no-one caring about me would run a close second.
Plenty of rich pensioners around here. There's also plenty of poor pensioners. That's not a justification for a totally unfair system. If this NI increase goes ahead they will be quids in especially with £1 million houses NI isn't the right way to do it, but £1m houses is a SE thing. Round where I am, house prices are much lower (new detached 4 beds for £305k) a so basing a system on the idea that every pensioner was sitting on £1m equity wouldn't work.
Give them the Triple Lock and bingo. If you are in a £1m house, your occupational or self funded pension will be large enough that the size of the increase in state pension won't have a great deal of effect on you. The people that the triple lock helps are people those living entirely on the state pension, or with an occupational pension of around £5k a year, many of whom will still be paying rent, I'm not too convinced by the guaranteed 2.5%, and the earnings link needs to be reconsidered for this year only, because the whopping "increase" in average earnings is mainly the result of the lowest earners being removed temporarily from the labour market. We've tried linking pensions just to earnings or just to inflation, but it didn't work, and we had pensioners dying from hypothermia every winter - that's why the fuel allowance was first brought in.