God thigh how horrific. I'm so sorry - what indeed can you do in these situations.
I had bereavement counselling from Cruse after dh died earlier this year, she was just a very nice woman, very experienced, and it was helpful as far as it went. But increasingly I found that longer term stuff was coming up. I was lucky to be able to spend dh's pension on therapy for myself. I chose an integrative therapist and am finding it pretty good. Helps me break out of some of the circles of thinking I get into (and boy there are a lot of them). Helped me deal with the situation with my mother to some extent, though tbh this thread is pretty good at that.
I wondered if anyone would be interested to see the advanced directive I have now written for myself. I think the generic ones on the Age concern website are fairly useless in practice, and our local GPs have got one I think which also seems a bit rubbish. The next step is to get it put on my record by my GP, if they will agree to it. I'll post it - do skip past it if you aren't interested!
'IN THE EVENT THAT A FULL CAPACITY ASSESSMENT FOR A DECISION ON MEDICAL TREATMENT SHOWS THAT I HAVE NO CAPACITY TO MAKE MY OWN DECISIONS, PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW.
The instructions change based on my son's age (date of birth XX/XX/XX). Where an episode of care begins when [ds] is one age, but then ds moves to a new age category during the episode, care should change according to the instructions below. Therefore, for example, I might be admitted to intensive care when ds is still 18 based on the instructions in the first paragraph below, but the day of his 19th birthday, the instructions in the second paragraph below come into force.
If my son [name] born XX/XX/XX is 18 years old or younger:
All active treatment should be pursued for as long as my consultant believes it to be in my best interests, with the assumption that I wish to remain alive almost at any cost, including the acquisition of profound disability.
If my son [name] dob XX/XX/XX is aged between 18 years and 24 years old:
Ward-based care should be pursued. Intensive care support and ventilation should be considered only if there is a near certainty of me regaining mental capacity within a month from admission for major decisions on my own care, such as tube feeding versus feeding at risk of aspiration, or discharge destination. If it is considered that I am unlikely to regain capacity for these decisions, the ceiling of care should be on the ward and I should not receive intensive care support.
If my son [name] is 25 or older:
These instructions now come into force even if my loss of mental capacity is considered to be very brief and temporary, such as during a urinary tract infection.
My best interests in this case should now recognise that I have absolutely no interest in extending my life for its own sake once my son is fully adult. I have already spent some years working in hospitals, and the situations I have observed there have informed my decisions. I am also influenced by the observation of the lives and declining health of my parents, aunts, uncles, parents-in-law, friends and of course the death of my husband.
The approach to my care should now be entirely palliative, seeking to reduce any distress or symptoms I show, but without any focus on cure or extending life for its own sake. This includes avoiding radical radiotherapy or chemotherapy, surgery, antibiotics, IV fluids and any tube feeding unless it is considered that these are purely to reduce symptoms. For example, a feeding tube might be appropriate if it were considered to be the only realistic way of ensuring access to pain relief for me, or of making sure that I did not experience debilitating hunger or thirst. Likewise, palliative radiotherapy might be appropriate where it could reduce pain, but not where its only purpose is to extend life. Where possible, a palliative care consultant should take over my care if they are willing to do so, rather than a general medic or surgeon. This is not in any way to imply that I do not trust general medics or surgeons, but only that the focus on palliation should be aiming for the best care in this field that can be achieved.
My wishes on discharge destination should of course be considered. In general I would much prefer to die in a hospice than at home, where this is possible to achieve, but I recognise that this is not always possible or appropriate. A nursing home may be a good substitute for a hospice. The wishes of my caregivers and the reality of nursing a person to death should always be considered part of my best interests, in that I believe very strongly that a person is part of a system of friends and family, and that the idea of individual ‘best interests’ separate from the interests of the system around them can be very damaging. I do not wish my son to nurse me at home unless there is absolutely no alternative.
Signed
Name
Date'