Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

Whitehall “braced for private schools collapse” 3

1000 replies

ICouldBeVioletSky · 23/02/2025 09:16

Starting a third thread to discuss impact of VAT on private school fees, as the topic looks likely to run (and run). Though probably best to finish off the second thread before posting here, thx.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
34
KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 16:41

twistyizzy · 07/03/2025 16:38

No you were using whataboutery. No flying leaps needed.
Put very simply, taxing parents using independent schools won't help state schools.

Edited

Just bringing a bit of much needed context. Flying leaps and the same old tropes abound. Every one of these threads is the same.

twistyizzy · 07/03/2025 16:44

KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 16:31

Yes they have inherited a humungous mess from the Tories and little in the way of funds to do anything about it so are resorting to shuffling deckchairs. That's the frame for all of this.

Labour are cutting funding to the tune of 1.4 billion in order to fund public sector payrises! How does that help schools?

twistyizzy · 07/03/2025 16:44

KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 16:41

Just bringing a bit of much needed context. Flying leaps and the same old tropes abound. Every one of these threads is the same.

Back at you

twistyizzy · 07/03/2025 16:46

KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 16:41

Just bringing a bit of much needed context. Flying leaps and the same old tropes abound. Every one of these threads is the same.

The really funny thing is that most of what some of us said would happen 12 months is now unfolding. Maybe stop being so dismissive and blindly supporting an economically illiterate policy.

KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 16:50

twistyizzy · 07/03/2025 16:44

Labour are cutting funding to the tune of 1.4 billion in order to fund public sector payrises! How does that help schools?

Are you saying there should not be public sector pay rises?

KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 16:51

twistyizzy · 07/03/2025 16:46

The really funny thing is that most of what some of us said would happen 12 months is now unfolding. Maybe stop being so dismissive and blindly supporting an economically illiterate policy.

I didn't even say I support it. Another flying trapeze act?

twistyizzy · 07/03/2025 16:51

KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 16:50

Are you saying there should not be public sector pay rises?

Are you saying they should come at the expense of funding schools?

KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 17:31

twistyizzy · 07/03/2025 16:51

Are you saying they should come at the expense of funding schools?

You go first

FixItFi · 07/03/2025 17:33

KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 17:31

You go first

I’m not sure anyone is claiming this will be used for improving schools anymore. It’s being spent on schooling the children forced out the independent sector and 60p breakfasts.

Labraradabrador · 07/03/2025 18:11

KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 17:31

You go first

I’ll go! I think they gave far too much given the state of finances and then disingenuously pretended that was part of the famous ‘black hole’. while I don’t begrudge higher pay for the public sector, the money has to come from somewhere.

SwordOfOmens · 07/03/2025 18:25

So sad!

Anyway

KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 18:49

Labraradabrador · 07/03/2025 18:11

I’ll go! I think they gave far too much given the state of finances and then disingenuously pretended that was part of the famous ‘black hole’. while I don’t begrudge higher pay for the public sector, the money has to come from somewhere.

5.5% for teachers far too much?

EasternStandard · 07/03/2025 18:52

This policy doesn't help with those pay rises though.

It just damages a sector, and interrupts dc education. So what's the point?

Labraradabrador · 07/03/2025 18:58

KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 18:49

5.5% for teachers far too much?

Yes.

KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 18:59

Labraradabrador · 07/03/2025 18:58

Yes.

And doctors?

Labraradabrador · 07/03/2025 19:00

KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 18:59

And doctors?

Same answer.

KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 19:01

Labraradabrador · 07/03/2025 19:00

Same answer.

So you'd rather have strikes would you?

Labraradabrador · 07/03/2025 19:02

KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 19:01

So you'd rather have strikes would you?

Strikes look likely regardless.

FixItFi · 07/03/2025 19:03

EasternStandard · 07/03/2025 18:52

This policy doesn't help with those pay rises though.

It just damages a sector, and interrupts dc education. So what's the point?

It’s just standard whataboutary when people can’t argue facts. The NHS and child poverty will be mentioned next, those 5 year olds at prep schools are to blame for so much.

KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 19:05

Labraradabrador · 07/03/2025 19:02

Strikes look likely regardless.

£15/hour is fine for a fully qualified doctor is it? They can earn as much in Aldi or driving an Uber. Do you think that's right after five years in med school and £100k of debt? Are they just public servants in every sense of the word?

KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 19:08

I think some may be mixing up pay increases with pay restoration. Two very different things.

cantkeepawayforever · 07/03/2025 19:09

It is difficult because teachers and doctors - and many other public sector workers - are leaving their positions due to a) relatively poor pay for their qualifications and experience and b) poor working conditions in run down and cash-starved services that make it increasingly difficult to deliver the good service that the public deserves.

Allowing pay to fall further behind comparable alternative jobs requiring similar levels of education and responsibility AND not investing public services isn’t really a good way forward either.

BotDranning · 07/03/2025 19:09

FixItFi · 23/02/2025 13:09

All quite predictable. It’s always been a purely spite policy aimed at disrupting the childhood of the offspring of ‘wrong thinking’ parents. Probably one of the most insidious and self destructive policies of the last 30 years at a time we can least afford it.

Agree with everything you've said

Labraradabrador · 07/03/2025 19:11

KendricksGin · 07/03/2025 19:08

I think some may be mixing up pay increases with pay restoration. Two very different things.

Both need to be funded, though.

if Labour wants to ‘restore’ pay they need to have an accompanying financial plan for funding it - either a meaningful way of generating revenue or a significant cut in spending elsewhere.

Labraradabrador · 07/03/2025 19:13

cantkeepawayforever · 07/03/2025 19:09

It is difficult because teachers and doctors - and many other public sector workers - are leaving their positions due to a) relatively poor pay for their qualifications and experience and b) poor working conditions in run down and cash-starved services that make it increasingly difficult to deliver the good service that the public deserves.

Allowing pay to fall further behind comparable alternative jobs requiring similar levels of education and responsibility AND not investing public services isn’t really a good way forward either.

Agree wholeheartedly but undermining private ed will negatively affect both a and b.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.