2 letters I saw in a regional paper this week. The teaching of gender identity as fact in primary schools is causing concern. I would never have seen letters published on this topic in the past
The first
Many questions
remain on gender-identity affirmation
SIR,
I am writing in response to Stephen Fernane's opinion piece (March 8): 'Are gender identity and parental consent at odds with each other?'
Many parents are also beginning to question the rush into gender identity affirmation, when the cost is so extraordinarily evasive and when the long-term benefits are disputable and unknown.
Similar to Minister Norma Foley, Tavistock, the UK's child gender clinic, had argued for “the entitlement of children to make decisions for themselves.” The NHS review of the Tavistock Clinic led to the clinic's closure because it was unable to show that it could adequately provide evidence-based recommendations to patients.
It had experienced a staggering 5,000 per cent increase in referrals, primarily from girls, over a six years period. There is no scientific consensus as to why this happened. However, parental consent was identified as being crucial in obtaining the best outcomes for children, including minors.
It seems that parents really do know their children best and are better positioned as a result to provide greater guidance when it comes to assessing the options, risks and benefits of any action, especially those with life-long consequences.
Finally, given the low prevalence of gender dysphoria in adults - estimated at 0.1% - and the high rates that desist with their trans identification before adulthood without any intervention, I question the wisdom of recent rhetoric and curriculum changes.
Would the best solution not be to provide those with gender dysphoria the right psychological and healthcare supports, and those with gender confusion with much-needed guidance, especially from their parents and that gender theorists should be philosophically and scientifically challenged, so as to ensure the right protections for all our children?
Perhaps the reality is after all, that parents, not being motivated along ideological or political grounds are best positioned as the constitution (article 42.1) states to be the “primary and natural educator” of their child,