Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Covid

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

Slowly but surely, the truth is emerging.

280 replies

Chrissykabel · 14/01/2026 10:19

In a US interview with Bill Maher, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has just nuked the narrative.

“If you look at the Pfizer vaccine studies, the people who got the vaccine had a 23 percent HIGHER death rate from all causes.”

Bill Maher panics.
“But that could be the disease itself…”

Kennedy ends it.
“Then the vaccine doesn’t WORK, does it?”

That’s it. Game over.

If a vaccine doesn’t reduce overall deaths, it failed.
If deaths go UP, it’s not protection. It’s harm.

They censored doctors.
They buried data.
They bullied the public.

Now the truth is leaking out anyway. We have all been gaslighted on an industrial scale.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Blueuggboots · 14/01/2026 10:21

If you believe anything RFK says….well…

RedTagAlan · 14/01/2026 10:22

RFK. Yeah.

We should all listen to him /s

TheAutumnCrow · 14/01/2026 10:23

Oh no. We’re all going to die.

itsthetea · 14/01/2026 10:24

So you give a vaccine predominantly to older and more vulnerable people and the get surprised that some of them die ?

he doesn’t have the brains to cope with the “did more people die than expected for that age/ illness profile “

BirdytheHero · 14/01/2026 10:25

This is likely just nonsense given it's RFK.

However I suspect that death rates among people receiving the vaccine (especially now) are higher because a far higher proportion of people receiving the vaccine are elderly or have health problems. At the moment in the UK the age cut off for the vaccine is 75 so yes, I can well believe that all-cause mortality is higher in people over 75 than in the general population- how could it not be?

Chrissykabel · 14/01/2026 10:25

The usual 'head in the sand' crowd out in force today I see.

OP posts:
Perplexed20 · 14/01/2026 10:26

Oh my

Thundertoast · 14/01/2026 10:27

OP, what are your thoughts on RFK JRs stances on what causes autism?

FancyCatSlave · 14/01/2026 10:27

😂😂😂😂😂
Where did you buy your tin hat out of interest, is it MAGA branded?

BillieWiper · 14/01/2026 10:28

Sorry but the source of this information is not reputable at all. Of course he thinks that.

I don't even have the COVID vaccine by choice, but I'm still glad my 88 year old mum has it.

Imicola · 14/01/2026 10:29

LOL

Chrissykabel · 14/01/2026 10:30

itsthetea · 14/01/2026 10:24

So you give a vaccine predominantly to older and more vulnerable people and the get surprised that some of them die ?

he doesn’t have the brains to cope with the “did more people die than expected for that age/ illness profile “

No, I believe the data takes this into account, so not at all relevant.

OP posts:
itsthetea · 14/01/2026 10:30

Oh dear

yes you have your head in the sand OP.

suppose out of 10 people one would die each year
if after the vaccine one still dies That’s NOT the fault of any vaccine or treatment you ha move given them that year

the vaccine wasn’t to prevent death from existing causes

and not everyone had the vaccine, with those less at risk less likely to have it, and the Pfizer was preferentially given to the more vulnerable at one point

but go ahead , stick your fingers in your ears and sing La La La

and that’s ignoring the fact that I wouldn’t trust him to add 1 to 1 and get 2.

itsthetea · 14/01/2026 10:31

Does he bollocks take everything into account properly

EarthlyNightshade · 14/01/2026 10:32

Younger healthier people more likely to not have vaccine. These people are generally less likely to die.

SerendipityJane · 14/01/2026 10:34

Chrissykabel · 14/01/2026 10:25

The usual 'head in the sand' crowd out in force today I see.

Better than up an arse surely ?

Chrissykabel · 14/01/2026 10:34

itsthetea · 14/01/2026 10:30

Oh dear

yes you have your head in the sand OP.

suppose out of 10 people one would die each year
if after the vaccine one still dies That’s NOT the fault of any vaccine or treatment you ha move given them that year

the vaccine wasn’t to prevent death from existing causes

and not everyone had the vaccine, with those less at risk less likely to have it, and the Pfizer was preferentially given to the more vulnerable at one point

but go ahead , stick your fingers in your ears and sing La La La

and that’s ignoring the fact that I wouldn’t trust him to add 1 to 1 and get 2.

The vaccine was only ever tested against preventing 'mild to moderate covid symptoms'. Regarding this the Absolute Risk Reduction was a mere 0.84%. So not really very effective at all.

OP posts:
KateShugakIsALegend · 14/01/2026 10:34

@Chrissykabel do you think that there was a conspiracy to kill people?

If so, why would this method be chosen?

I think if I were an evil genius I might poison the water supply. Much more effective.

SequoiaTree · 14/01/2026 10:35

itsthetea · 14/01/2026 10:24

So you give a vaccine predominantly to older and more vulnerable people and the get surprised that some of them die ?

he doesn’t have the brains to cope with the “did more people die than expected for that age/ illness profile “

Exactly. It's pretty obvious and doesn't take much brains at all to see that.

Chrissykabel · 14/01/2026 10:35

EarthlyNightshade · 14/01/2026 10:32

Younger healthier people more likely to not have vaccine. These people are generally less likely to die.

Hence a 23% increase in all cause mortality for the vaccinated in the younger age group is a cause for concern, right?

OP posts:
HarvestMouseandGoldenCups · 14/01/2026 10:35

And his source of this statement is?

FlorenceAndTheVagine · 14/01/2026 10:36

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ArtTheClownIsNotAMime · 14/01/2026 10:37

This is why the curriculum should focus on critical thinking above all else.

Chrissykabel · 14/01/2026 10:37

KateShugakIsALegend · 14/01/2026 10:34

@Chrissykabel do you think that there was a conspiracy to kill people?

If so, why would this method be chosen?

I think if I were an evil genius I might poison the water supply. Much more effective.

No, but there was an agenda to make money (vested interests) and increase control and compliance. Think about it, if health was our politicians concern during lockdown, why did they close the gyms but allow McDonalds to stay open throughout?

OP posts: