I wouldn't assume no-one contributing these threads is a scientists or an analyst.
People have given you specific criticisms of the website, which you're choosing to ignore and instead cry "ad hominen". (Bingo card anyone?)
It's also absolutely bonkers - one publication (if well designed, powered, replicated, maybe triangulating different methods to come to broadly the same answer) would be enough for me to update my opinion on who should be offered vaccination. Listing 1000 just demonstrates all they've done is found 1000 titles related to vaccine complications and stuck them on a website.
To start with, they haven't bothered removing review or opinion pieces and are still counting those in the 1000. No summary of what the papers found, removal of duplicates, case studies, meta-analysis, risk of bias, quality assessment, sensitivity analyses.
This isn't how evidence synthesis is done, and you're completely ignoring the fact that independetly, each country has reviewed all available evidence before deciding who should be offered vaccination