[quote OrangeShark27]@FflosFfantastig he said they give less than 8 weeks reduction in transmission. He hasn't had one and won't be getting one. He pretty much said vaccination was pointless
He did not say he supported people's right to free choice, he didn't actually talk about choice he talked about himself not having a vaccine, and refusing to get one for some unknown reason. Its clearly anti-vacc. Hes hardly encouraged people to get vaccinated has he?
If you support free chiice, responsibly you could talk about the benefits of vaccination, the safety of vaccination and encourage people to get vaccinated whilst still supporting their right to make that informed choice. Hes basically just said I don't want a vaccine[/quote]
He said he does not want a vaccine and should not lose his job because of it. A job he has been doing quite adequately throughout the pandemic. Presumably when we didn't even have vaccines. It is a pro choice viewpoint. He does not want his ability to earn money removed as punishment because he made a different choice to others and believes he should be able to make decisions concerning his own body. That's a very moderate viewpoint actually. Believing in choice is not the viewpoint of a radical person. Believing people should be forced into having an injection is a radical viewpoint by comparison.
He said the vaccines reduced transmission for a period of time. That's not saying they aren't useful. Quite the opposite. It means they're useful for at least 8 weeks! All good.
The piece is just being twisted in order to label someone. Labelling is becoming the norm. Pro choice = 'anti vaxx'. Not useful and actually not very grown up.