@hangryyhippo has it? Haven’t seen anything official but would love to.
and? What’s the result? For a company that is so confident their product is so safe?
they can’t explain how these weirdly different serious side effects happen and who is at risk - myocarditis, blood clots, period loss - is there any other product with such randomly (in my humble opinion, but probably related somehow) serious issues affecting different body parts/systems?
I’ve heard some attempts at explanations on blood clots (and now periods), but don’t think they were directly from the companies themselves, no exact mechanism described, no who is at risk explained either
some of these issues are very rare but periods is not so much so
its quite common in science for this to happen, you understand the mechanism you’re testing for, you can test for the desired result, you get it = promising drug or treatment
but you test and test, especially with new drugs, bc you don’t know what you don’t know
so far historically, pharma has chosen to take the time rather than the lawsuits, but without any liability now there is no risk for them
so far historically also, for ex, it has been ethical to allow limited release for “promising” cancer drugs, but not yet fully tested, only on terminal cancer patients. And many have been very successful at their target but killed the patients in another way (too toxic, heart attacks, etc) and they were never released
cancer is very serious but people with stages lower than terminal had always been put through decades tested treatments and not the latest “miracle drugs”
imho this should have been released to people at risk only, as by the time we got the vaccine we knew the risk by different age groups & health status and many groups have extremely small chances of death
another unethical thing that happened was to tell pregnant women that it was safe, before they had any data on it. To their record, Pfizer & etc never said on their website that they tested on pregnant women, they had the disclaimer there. The tests that were eventually done were “live”, and so far only looked at pregnancy outcomes, rate of miscarriage, live births, still births and they said that was compatible with unvaccinated population, and again this is very promising, but should continue with blood/toxicology tests for the women and their babies, and so far I haven’t seen anything on that either.
i welcome being “debunked”, would love to see any other tests done (direct sources please) or any official explanations with biological mechanism involved and who’s at risk (once you can understand the mechanism you can say or design a test to tell - like an allergy test or whatever)
I’ve asked for these studies before, but people who so far have been very sure on how safe and tested these things are, go quiet, or send me to some newspaper who refers a test that if you go to its source you find what I’ve said (pregnancy outcomes tested only etc), but ironically people continue to do as before. To each their own.