If it is where I think it is roughly a staff rate of just past 300 per 100,000 (based on a seven day rate), roughly four times higher than that for its overall student body
300 per 100,000 is lower than the general population rate, and lower than all working age age groups other than 20-29, so unless the uni has a young skewed working population this is below expected (even before you get to testing likelihood and that all of the group work outside the home etc.)
Suggests this uni has lower general rates now.
I wonder why 20-24s up again? Immunity wearing off already?
My guess would be different mixing has enabled more groups who missed it in the summer opening without the protection of friends who'd already had it - as opposed to immunity waning - if it is immunity waning though, we should see it in re-infection survey as so many of this group tested before.