Can anyone here help me make sense of comparing the transmission tables from the PHE surveillance report?
I’m looking at two consecutive reports - so transmission between weeks 36-39 compared with weeks 37- 40.
On weeks 36-39 rates of infection per 100,000 seem almost identical between vaccinated and unvaccinated. I read a thread from John Burn-Murdoch, which said the way data was collected over-estimated unvaccinated numbers which skewered the results.
However when you look at the following report for weeks 37-40, the rates for vaccinated cases is almost 3 times higher than unvaccinated in some age brackets? Can the poor data collection method that John identifies really be responsible for that???
Link to john’s thread: mobile.twitter.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1448601433989947392