if you read lonely's posted article , it links you straight to two sets of minutes marsha, although there are several more.
I do think those who are going to stick to the belief (used a lot now by those who hang around school gates intimidating children and teachers ,and also some people on MN) that the JCVI are god like , utterly objective and beyond criticism really at least could read the minutes to see if they still feel that. Which they might.
This may well not be JCVI's look out or fault at all. They say so many times in the minutes that how information was communicated to the public was crucial. It was not their decision that their discussions should be so briefly outlined, and basically heavily edited to one point.
But it is definitely the case that they say they only 'opine' on medical benefit and then do seem to have 'opined' ore widely. In one of the minutes, it is obvious there was a bit of a spat about school attendance. And yet one thing that did come out of their discussions to the public was the belief that post vaccine school attendance drop was a concern. The minutes make it clear that this was contested as a a concern in the meeting.