If it was purely just down to people not testing we would have just down to a certain level and stayed or increased as more people start testing again
Yes, there is no real mechanism for the compliance of people to test to be continuously falling whilst at the same time R is above 1 (since even as more people refused to test, there would also be more people with symptoms if there were cases, and if the people weren't compliant R would also increase as people didn't isolate.
Non-compliance is simply not a viable justification for falling cases over a few cycles of infection that I can see, i.e. if 50% of people who were testing decided not to test overnight, then rates would immediately half, but from that position they would then grow again, and grow faster (due to half not isolating) that's not the data.
kids going to different activities in areas that are low risk wouldn't necessarily have had covid by now
Of course not, but then they would continue to be in low risk areas, as I said there's the additional risk of holiday break ups extending spreaders into these low risk areas, that's the context of my comment, and it would be from individuals in the low risk area returning with it - the high risk areas are already falling.