Food for thought about our regulatory system.....
www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-eu-astrazeneca/astrazeneca-vaccine-not-ready-for-quick-european-approval-watchdog-official-says-idUSKBN2930XC
"The dose interval for the Pfizer vaccine in Britain was changed from 21 days to “at least 21 days” on Wednesday, and for both vaccines, the second dose was advised to be given up to 12 weeks later."
"Pfizer, sounded more cautious on the prospect of shifting the schedule of the second dose of the vaccine, noting it had not been evaluated on different dosing schedules.*
“There are no data to demonstrate that protection after the first dose is sustained after 21 days,” it said in a statement, ..."
this is gov related, but shows lack of understanding
"The government said it would also not recommend one vaccine over another for different cohorts of the population, even though data on the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine’s efficacy in older people is currently limited."
---
I am not being paranoid and I don't have an agenda. I am just trying to highlight the issue that others have picked up on:
"Britain said on Wednesday it would prioritise making sure that more people receive their first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine quickly over giving a second shot to those who have already had one, a change in strategy as the country battles record numbers of new coronavirus cases."
*My comment: this is obviously a politically driven decision imo - as I could not find any legit data to back up why a regulatory body would change the schedule when there is no data behind it. And from this point on I think it is reasonable to question MHRA's motives.