The 1918 flu pandemic caused very high mortality in under 5s and 20-40 age group. Over 90% of all those who died in the 1918 pandemic were under 65. There was a peak of deaths in those aged around 28 in the 2nd wave of the 1918 pandemic.
I wonder, if the same was the case with covid, whether we would be having the same conversation regarding whether or not to have the vaccine. I doubt it somehow - I think people would be climbing over each other to have the vaccine. Maybe it's just that the elderly and clinically vulnerable are seen as expendable - they don't matter, they can be left to die, just so long as everyone else is OK.
It has been explained many times on these threads and by people who know what they're talking about, that the reason the covid vaccines have been able to be rolled out so quickly is down to the £, $, euros/yen/yuan thrown at them - the fact that the researchers haven't had to wait, sometimes for years, between rounds of funding. Down to the fact that some of the research has been piggy backed on to previous tried and tested research. Thousands around the world, including many in the UK, brave, selfless people, have already had this vaccination so that it can be rolled out to protect billions of others.
You have no idea how long any drugs/vaccines you take have been trialled for, absolutely not a clue.
You also haven't answered my questions posed last night about what you'd have us all do if we don't have the vaccine. If our economic shutdown lasts for much longer the last 8 months will seem like a walk in the park.
If you don't want the vaccine, then don't have it, but please, please, stop with the scaremongering when it is so very obvious you don't have a clue and can't be bothered to do your own research.