Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Covid

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

Would anyone support another national lockdown?

364 replies

RubyandBen · 13/10/2020 19:54

Same as the last one. Schools, non essential shops, hospitality etc. stretching on for a few months. If yes, can I ask what are your personal circumstances?

OP posts:
Badbanana · 14/10/2020 19:09

My minimum expectations for standard of living and quality of life for my children and I are damn well higher than this!

Yes, all those parents from war torn countries just have lower standards than you.

Why, if they gave a crap, they’d have stamped their feet and screamed at the bombs that they just wouldn’t be bloody putting up with it!

Learn some resilience (and teach some to your children) and stop pretending that the soft lockdown we had in this country is even akin to ‘catastrophic’.

Waxonwaxoff0 · 14/10/2020 19:16

@Malachite234 the military won't be patrolling the streets. We do not live in a dictatorship.

WinifredSanderson · 14/10/2020 19:17

@Badbanana maybe not catastrophic for you, but for many of us who lost jobs, lost income, lost their homes, lost their right to treatment for all the other life threatening conditions that exist other than covid. You speak for yourself. You don't get to speak for the rest of us.

SandyGin · 14/10/2020 19:34

I would support a very strict 2-3 week national lockdown, including schools and a local (5 miles) and international travel ban with the exception of keyworkers, urgent health appointments and so on; no private jets coming in and out either this time. A travel ban is essential to reduce viral spread from high risk areas and to prevent a repeat of the shameful scenes of crowded beauty spots, National Parks and beaches. I think it should start with urgency on Friday, (next Friday at the latest), timed to extend half term, and expect to have to repeat it several times before next summer. I think it is the only way to save lives, protect the NHS and prevent a many months' long lockdown which would be much more detrimental to the economy and mental health.

Boris is getting things wrong (again). It is almost as if he thinks that the vast majority of people who will die are expendable cannon fodder.

I am a parent of school age DCs, one in the most important exam years, but there is little point to a 'circuit breaker' unless we include schools. Year group bubbles can be huge, siblings are in other bubbles, many travel crowded together on buses, and then return home to families and the community including the more vulnerable. We have been shielding a family member since March without any help at all - Boris says this is not necessary but all the best advice we have received says otherwise.

Extremely difficult times, in different ways, for many people. I think we have to look after each other and ourselves as best we can because I see no evidence that a careful, skilled hand is on the tiller guiding us through this terrible hooley of a returning storm.

Sodamncold · 14/10/2020 19:39

@Badbanana

My minimum expectations for standard of living and quality of life for my children and I are damn well higher than this!

Yes, all those parents from war torn countries just have lower standards than you.

Why, if they gave a crap, they’d have stamped their feet and screamed at the bombs that they just wouldn’t be bloody putting up with it!

Learn some resilience (and teach some to your children) and stop pretending that the soft lockdown we had in this country is even akin to ‘catastrophic’.

Ah, that’s your approach to a discussion. To completely twist (or perhaps you genuinely don’t understand?).

I’ll leave you to it.

Malachite234 · 14/10/2020 20:15

[quote Waxonwaxoff0]@Malachite234 the military won't be patrolling the streets. We do not live in a dictatorship.[/quote]
They should though.

Waxonwaxoff0 · 14/10/2020 20:17

No they shouldn't. It's actually scary that people would want that. Total control of the people by the government. Fuck that.

Malachite234 · 14/10/2020 20:21

@Waxonwaxoff0

No they shouldn't. It's actually scary that people would want that. Total control of the people by the government. Fuck that.
Well there would be no need if people would follow the rules. Sick of insta influencers and wannabees flouting the rules and nothing happens. People saying their dog couldn’t possibly be walked just once a day yada yada all the excuses under the sun. Rules don’t seem to apply to many people for some obscure excuse.

The military mobilised is what we need, scaring is what we need.

OneForMeToo · 14/10/2020 20:22

While everyone believes they have a better reason or cnba or fuck the rules is why the numbers will keep rising. You don’t want to be restricted fabulous for you, however when there isn’t a free bed for someone who needs it because you decide you are worth more or above the rules well done you.

Schools are not the problem nor are pubs it’s peoples selfish attitudes to it all that is killing people and the economy.

Those uni students wanting to party selfish, those wanting to fly off around the world still selfish, those who won’t wear masks to prove a point selfish, we will still have the huge family Christmas selfish, trick or treat must happen for the children selfish, those who don’t care about the rule of 6 or distancing selfish. These people are the ones running up the numbers and innocent people get swept up in their virus spreading.

TheKeatingFive · 14/10/2020 20:23

The government that brings in the military on this would never be forgiven for it.

They know that.

FieldsAndSun · 14/10/2020 20:23

I'd except a lockdown on everything except schools

cologne4711 · 14/10/2020 21:47

A travel ban is essential to reduce viral spread from high risk areas and to prevent a repeat of the shameful scenes of crowded beauty spots, National Parks and beaches

can't see the "shameful scenes" being repeated in late October, to be honest. Unless we suddenly have a late October heatwave.

The virus doesn't know that you've gone more than 5 miles from home, it's a stupid rule.

cologne4711 · 14/10/2020 21:49

People saying their dog couldn’t possibly be walked just once a day yada yada all the excuses under the sun

There is zero reason for people to not walk their dogs twice a day. There is very little, if any, evidence of transmission outdoors. What needs to stop is unnecessary mixing indoors.

ZenNudist · 14/10/2020 21:54

No absolutely not. Children need school. Businesses need to function. We had months of lockdown and it didn't work. It makes me angry. It was the wrong idea last time but we did it because we didn't know better. It's stupid to do it a second time. We would just find ourselves opening up to shut down again. Again.

profilechange · 14/10/2020 22:00

Absolutely no way. Not doing it again. What about mental health, children in vulnerable families, domestic violence, I could go on.
The media have whipped everyone up into a complete frenzy. Just let's get on with life, be sensible but carry on as best we can.

MadameBlobby · 14/10/2020 22:14

They should though.

No they shouldn’t. What a ridiculous suggestion.

TheEmojiFormerlyKnownAsPrince · 14/10/2020 22:21

Oneformetoo- yes I’m with you.

Could l also add people saying ‘the lockdown didn't work’ It did work. It slowed and mitigated cases. That is what it was meant to do, and it did this dramatically. It was never designed to eradicate it.

HairyToity · 14/10/2020 22:25

I would prefer to keep going with restrictions. It is utterly exhausting trying to work and school children.

Malachite234 · 15/10/2020 00:22

@cologne4711

People saying their dog couldn’t possibly be walked just once a day yada yada all the excuses under the sun

There is zero reason for people to not walk their dogs twice a day. There is very little, if any, evidence of transmission outdoors. What needs to stop is unnecessary mixing indoors.

Oh an exception to the rule- what a surprise!
Kingsley08 · 15/10/2020 00:25

You all can argue till you’re blue in the face.

Schools are going to close. Once the kids are on half term (England time), they won’t be going back for another few weeks. It will be online, keyworkers and blended. Keir has warned us and as much as he huffed and puffed so has Bojo (he never ruled it out).

Two weeks from now, I’ll check back in and you can quote this post.

Stop complaining and start preparing.

Worriedmum999 · 15/10/2020 00:38

100% this ^^ no other option

7vio · 15/10/2020 00:41

No, please not a lockdown...

Worriedmum999 · 15/10/2020 00:44

Of course there will be Confused there’s no choice now or there will be a massive amount of deaths. There already will be now in 3 weeks anyway. Even the newspapers are softening people for it now and over half the population want it. It will happen.

Northernsoulgirl45 · 15/10/2020 06:10

@RonaLisa if we went into lockdown I would comply with it as before.

Hyperfish101 · 15/10/2020 06:30

I have said elsewhere that I would take a 2-3 week lockdown over the confusing raft of restrictions we have now that are set to run on and on. I live in a highly restricted area though. If I was in tier 1 I would be gutted.

They must build in an end point though.