I thought initially it sounded plausible but then the refusal to apologise and the way he wasn't taking responsibility started to remind me of abusers and the way they manipulate the story.
I can get behind anyone who says 'I made an error of judgement in a panic.' This was 'I'm sorry you feel I was wrong.'
Taking the drive to a well known beauty spot on his wife's birthday to 'test his eyesight' took the biscuit.
I would have preferred. "We were feeling a bit better and went out for some fresh air on her birthday. In retrospect it was a bad judgement."
Also so many have managed to stay at home whilst ill with young children - especially SAH mums - many in flats with no help. There was no acknowledgement of this.
His exceptional circumstances for the safeguarding of children was weak. That exception was put in for kids at risk of domestic abuse and children in care etc - not for treks across the country.
I also can't believe he didn't stop once on the way there with a 4 year old in the back - no toilet breaks? No fuel stops?
He and his wife have family in London and he is a powerful and well connected man - you can't tell me he had no other childcare options.
While at his parents he had to call an ambulance for his son using resources in a rural place. He picked up his wife and son from hospital - drove to a hospital with symptoms of Covid to pick up his wife and son who had been exposed to him with symptoms of Covid. I thought he travelled so family could help if need be - could his sister not have picked them up?
Also this directly contradicts his wife's article about what happened - just doesn't make sense.
I just want him to go.