I really don't get why people don't understand just how much we needed the lockdowns. The deaths would have risen so steeply without them and made the graphs we see now unrecognisable. The NHS would have been massively overwhelmed
Again, there is no evidence that locking down healthy under 65s has actually made a difference. The repercussions of doing so will likely be much worse than covid19.
We may well have been in exactly the same position, but without a distroyed economy and all the additional deaths associated with it and lockdown, by only locking down the old and vulnerable.
We actually need the virus to spread without the number of seriously ill patients overwhelming the nhs. A full lockdown has stopped the spread too much. We are not trying the eradicate the illness. It needs to circulate the population, we will all get it at some point, if not multiple times. We are simply trying to control the speed of the spread.
Like Spanish flu, once it's circulated the population most people will have some sort of immunity, and it will just go into the normal viral rotation killing a few weak and vulnerable each year, and giving others a mild illness.
Like it or not that is how virus spread works and how it is naturally manged within a population. Trying to stop it is like trying to stop a sunami. The old and weak dying from infection is part of the circle of life.
Most academics are now stating the lockdown was not a good idea. We will also have an issue with weakened immune systems once we start mixing again. I would expect lots of strep, colds, flu and tummy bugs in kids as soon as the schools go back.