mass gatherings and so on, actually don’t make much difference
Evidence? I am losing trust in government advisors being impartial here. It made a difference in China and WHO is praising Italy (though possibly happened a bit late there). Why is UK different?
Also, mass gatherings: you don't need to be a rocket scientist, or indeed epidemiologist, to see this is bollocks. If you stay at home you could infect your family (for sake of argument 4 people) - if you go out you can pass it on by coughing to everyone on the public transport near you (within 2m, which is a lot on the tube), everyone you're sitting next to at the 'mass gathering' and then they go off and the same applies. It doesn't make any logical sense saying this.
I am losing trust in this government.
I wonder - would there be scope for mass legal action if the death toll is really high here and the government demonstrably didn't follow WHO advice / advice from countries who got it earlier?