Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

UN Security Council to vote on Strait of Hormuz

269 replies

Twiglets1 · 03/04/2026 07:55

The UN Security Council’s vote on a proposal to ensure the safety of ships in the Strait of Hormuz has been rescheduled from Friday to Saturday, according to media reports.

The council’s 15 members are set to vote on a resolution from Bahrain aimed at protecting commercial shipping in the critical waterway, which usually carries about one-fifth of global oil and natural gas supplies.

The Associated Press and Reuters news agencies have reported that a draft resolution includes text authorising countries “to use all defensive means necessary” to protect commercial shipping.

The proposal is considered unlikely to pass, as China, a veto-wielding permanent member of the council, has made it clear that it opposes any resolution that mentions the use of force.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/4/2/iran-war-live-trump-to-address-nation-tehran-denies-seeking-ceasefire

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
Efacsen · 07/04/2026 12:06

PuttingOutFirewithGasoline · 07/04/2026 11:59

Oh I see ! It's for an innocent power plant.

That's very noble for a country drowning in oil!

Do you feel the same about Saudia Arabia investing in clean non-fossil fuels?

RedTagAlan · 07/04/2026 12:12

PuttingOutFirewithGasoline · 07/04/2026 11:59

Oh I see ! It's for an innocent power plant.

That's very noble for a country drowning in oil!

Clean energy V dirty. I have no idea what green policies Iran has in place, Anyway, you do know the UK was building nuke power plants at the height of the North sea oil boom.

rainingsnoring · 07/04/2026 12:36

PuttingOutFirewithGasoline · 07/04/2026 11:46

But I'm not comparing them ?
The irg is foul and I don't understand why anyone would stand up for them.

If you can explain why Iran has uranium that will help with the other points in your post

I'm asking you to question your assumptions that it is the Iranians who can't take part in any negotiations-see your post above. You don't want to.
Are you able to point out where anyone has 'stood up for the IRGC'?

rainingsnoring · 07/04/2026 12:39

Efacsen · 07/04/2026 12:00

Iran has allegedly been on the verge of acquiring nuclear missiles for almost 40 years

This has been achieved by negotiation inspection and satellite surveillance and has been effective for decades

And Bibi has been trying to persuade the US to bomb Iran and other countries in the ME for most of that time. He's the leader of the country in the ME that does actually have nuclear weapons and could use them....

TopPocketFind · 07/04/2026 12:49

Rather than negotiating with Iran for ending the war, Vance is visiting Hungary in support of Orban (Putin)

EasternStandard · 07/04/2026 12:49

PuttingOutFirewithGasoline · 07/04/2026 11:46

But I'm not comparing them ?
The irg is foul and I don't understand why anyone would stand up for them.

If you can explain why Iran has uranium that will help with the other points in your post

@PuttingOutFirewithGasoline info re what’s needed ie below 5% for civilian and what 60% means wrt stages of non civilian use is well recorded. It’s not about clean v dirty fuel in that sense anyway.

Twiglets1 · 07/04/2026 13:39

Article dated June 2025 What is uranium enrichment and how is it used for nuclear bombs? A scientist explains

Most civilian nuclear reactors use “low enriched uranium” that’s been enriched to between 3% and 5%. This means that 3–5% of the total uranium in the sample is now uranium-235. That’s enough to sustain a chain reaction and make electricity.

To get an explosive chain reaction, uranium-235 needs to be concentrated significantly more than the levels we use in nuclear reactors for making power or medicines.

Technically, a nuclear weapon can be made with as little as 20% uranium-235 (known as “highly enriched uranium”), but the more the uranium is enriched, the smaller and lighter the weapon can be. Countries with nuclear weapons tend to use about 90% enriched, “weapons-grade” uranium.

According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran has enriched large quantities of uranium to 60%. It’s actually easier to go from an enrichment of 60% to 90% than it is to get to that initial 60%. That’s because there’s less and less uranium-238 to get rid of.

This is why Iran is considered to be at extreme risk of producing nuclear weapons, and why centrifuge technology for enrichment is kept secret.

Ultimately, the exact same centrifuge technology that produces fuel for civilian reactors can be used to produce nuclear weapons.

Inspectors from the IAEA monitor nuclear facilities worldwide to ensure countries are abiding by the rules set out in the global nuclear non-proliferation treaty.

While Iran maintains it’s only enriching uranium for “peaceful purposes”, late last week the IAEA board ruled Iran was in breach of its obligations under the treaty.

https://science.anu.edu.au/news-events/news/what-uranium-enrichment-and-how-it-used-nuclear-bombs-scientist-explains#:~:text=Most%20civilian%20nuclear%20reactors%20use,chain%20reaction%20and%20make%20electricity.

OP posts:
RedTagAlan · 07/04/2026 13:42

His latest TRUTH attached from a screen clip.

Seems he does not want to wait for a UN resolution.

UN Security Council to vote on Strait of Hormuz
TopPocketFind · 07/04/2026 14:17

He is saying the Iranian people will be saved by killing their whole civilization?

Twiglets1 · 07/04/2026 14:37

TopPocketFind · 07/04/2026 14:17

He is saying the Iranian people will be saved by killing their whole civilization?

Obviously that makes no sense whatsoever and is just crazy rhetoric.

OP posts:
TopPocketFind · 07/04/2026 14:41

Twiglets1 · 07/04/2026 14:37

Obviously that makes no sense whatsoever and is just crazy rhetoric.

You hope it is just crazy rhetoric.

Could you have imagined a US president saying something like this?

RedTagAlan · 07/04/2026 14:45

Twiglets1 · 07/04/2026 14:37

Obviously that makes no sense whatsoever and is just crazy rhetoric.

Not sure about rhetoric. To me, him mentioning "civilization" shows he has been reading, or being told, about the Iranian Governments troll tweets. They trolled him about Persia being part of the cradle of civilization, and the US just 250 years old. Seems they got under his skin. Which is not difficult TBH.

Twiglets1 · 07/04/2026 14:49

TopPocketFind · 07/04/2026 14:41

You hope it is just crazy rhetoric.

Could you have imagined a US president saying something like this?

Well it plainly is crazy rhetoric because to say "a whole civilisation will die tonight" is hyperbole even if he does plan to follow through on his threat to destroy Iranian power plants and bridges tonight.

Trump is one of a kind that's for sure - and not in a good way.

OP posts:
TopPocketFind · 07/04/2026 14:53

Twiglets1 · 07/04/2026 14:49

Well it plainly is crazy rhetoric because to say "a whole civilisation will die tonight" is hyperbole even if he does plan to follow through on his threat to destroy Iranian power plants and bridges tonight.

Trump is one of a kind that's for sure - and not in a good way.

Do you think it is ok for an US president to say thinkgs like this, even if you think it is just crazy talk, hyperbole?

He didn't say it in private, he posted it for the world to see and nobody is able to reign him in.

Twiglets1 · 07/04/2026 14:59

TopPocketFind · 07/04/2026 14:53

Do you think it is ok for an US president to say thinkgs like this, even if you think it is just crazy talk, hyperbole?

He didn't say it in private, he posted it for the world to see and nobody is able to reign him in.

No I don't.

OP posts:
RedTagAlan · 07/04/2026 15:00

Twiglets1 · 07/04/2026 14:49

Well it plainly is crazy rhetoric because to say "a whole civilisation will die tonight" is hyperbole even if he does plan to follow through on his threat to destroy Iranian power plants and bridges tonight.

Trump is one of a kind that's for sure - and not in a good way.

90 million or so.

Mao has the record at about 60 million, ahead of the Austrian Corporal and the soviet fella.

Trump does always want to be number one.

Wonder where Iranian regime fits in that table.

Twiglets1 · 07/04/2026 15:04

RedTagAlan · 07/04/2026 15:00

90 million or so.

Mao has the record at about 60 million, ahead of the Austrian Corporal and the soviet fella.

Trump does always want to be number one.

Wonder where Iranian regime fits in that table.

Well he won't achieve it by blowing up tunnels and power plants - awful as that would be for the Iranian population.

OP posts:
TopPocketFind · 07/04/2026 15:09

Twiglets1 · 07/04/2026 15:04

Well he won't achieve it by blowing up tunnels and power plants - awful as that would be for the Iranian population.

Those numbers didn't happen overnight, it started small.

Twiglets1 · 07/04/2026 15:11

TopPocketFind · 07/04/2026 15:09

Those numbers didn't happen overnight, it started small.

With Trump, I believe the general view is that he is looking for an off ramp and doesn't want this war to carry on indefinitely.

OP posts:
RedTagAlan · 07/04/2026 15:15

TopPocketFind · 07/04/2026 15:09

Those numbers didn't happen overnight, it started small.

Yup. And the regime Mao set up is still in power. Even today they don't accept what he done. Or won't admit it.

TopPocketFind · 07/04/2026 15:21

Twiglets1 · 07/04/2026 15:11

With Trump, I believe the general view is that he is looking for an off ramp and doesn't want this war to carry on indefinitely.

Let's hope he doesn't listen to people like this then

Rep. Jodey Arrington on Iran: "Thank God we have a commander in chief that is not full of empty rhetoric, because we've delayed this inevitability for 50 years ... President Trump is a man with a bias for action. Thank God for President Trump and the courage and political will to do what he's doing"

Twiglets1 · 07/04/2026 15:24

TopPocketFind · 07/04/2026 15:21

Let's hope he doesn't listen to people like this then

Rep. Jodey Arrington on Iran: "Thank God we have a commander in chief that is not full of empty rhetoric, because we've delayed this inevitability for 50 years ... President Trump is a man with a bias for action. Thank God for President Trump and the courage and political will to do what he's doing"

I think Trump does what Trump wants to do, always.

Like most narcissists, he is not good at listening to other people.

OP posts:
TopPocketFind · 07/04/2026 15:27

Twiglets1 · 07/04/2026 15:24

I think Trump does what Trump wants to do, always.

Like most narcissists, he is not good at listening to other people.

So no way of telling if it all just 'crazy talk'

Ihatetomatoes · 07/04/2026 16:09

rainingsnoring · 07/04/2026 10:21

I understand, thanks. Apologies for missing that it was humour.

No worries. This is such a horrendous situation that humour occasionally.... we are so fortunate not to be in the middle of this though

Ihatetomatoes · 07/04/2026 16:18

Twiglets1 · 07/04/2026 14:37

Obviously that makes no sense whatsoever and is just crazy rhetoric.

It is.

He has no control over his tongue. He rants constantly. He rants one day then changes tact the next. He seems to not understand that the regime don't care about how many of their people die. Threatening the regime wont stop them. There doesn't even appear to be a leader, the man appointed might already be dead, he's never appeared. Is there any viable moderate leader (s) to take over.

Maybe concentrate on bombing areas that might be developing weapons or weapons stocks, if not already done.

The US have confirmed they won't be using nuclear weapons. I never thought they would. Shame that the leadership appear scared to speak against Trump, or at least, check his comments and filter them to a grown up level.

Swipe left for the next trending thread