Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

Trump throwing a lot of people under the bus because of stock markets?

1000 replies

mids2019 · 10/03/2026 07:33

When you start a war you finish it in my opinion. There has been no other war that has been stopped because of a slide on the Dow Jones or an oil price spike. For Trump to now prematurely call an end to the war simply because of economics will simply mean IIrans drone terrorism has worked.

The people of Iran will be left with a job half done without the space needed for an uprising.

A new leader with good reason to ideological hate Israel and the US will realise the only method of future deterrence of Iran is through acquiring a nuclear weapon as their conventional weapons were obliterated. Iran will now do everything possible to acquire such a weapon.

This is a time for resolve Mr. President. There is still a chance to destroy this regime maybe with limited target ground troop assaults. The world actually will be safer if you continue.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
54
Twiglets1 · 26/03/2026 09:14

Abhannmor · 26/03/2026 09:09

When is Starmer going to prescribe the Al Saud family then? They are causing death and destruction in Yemen . Why not proscribe the Emirates which are funding a terrible war in Sudan , causing famine. While he is about it he might proscribe the current leader of Syria , former (?) head of Al Qaeda. He was meant to hold elections after his victory in the civil war
Although , in fairness , he has a lot on - slaughtering Christians and Alawites. That is very time consuming.

How is Starmer slaughtering Christians?

Time consuming it may be but also a figment of your imagination.

Smeuse · 26/03/2026 09:20

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

EasternStandard · 26/03/2026 09:21

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

The pp wasn’t very clear tbf

Notonthestairs · 26/03/2026 09:22

Smeuse · 26/03/2026 09:10

There has been regime change, but not the sort the United States wanted.

https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2026/03/25/the-revolutionary-guards-are-taking-over-iran

archived version
https://archive.ph/e8fUt

I was just reading that article - law of unintended consequences. It doesn’t bode well.

KeepPumping · 26/03/2026 13:17

EasternStandard · 25/03/2026 14:18

Tbf anyone listening to Jeremy Bowen this morning will feel down about the prospects of that.

Is he the guy that had his interpreter blown up in the car in front of him by an IDF tank on live TV? They were specifically told not to drive in sight of the border patrols, it was a few years ago. What was he saying this time?

KeepPumping · 26/03/2026 13:23

MushMonster · 26/03/2026 00:46

I think Iran should attend the negotiations.

  1. It may end the armed conflict. And that is in everyone's interest.
  2. It offers Trump an exit from the conflict. Even if Israel will not stop fire too. At least is one less adversary to fight. I cannot get why Israel is not invited.... at least Trump is assuming Netanyahu will just do what he tells him to do, which we know by experience will not be the case.
  3. If the Strait does not open, safely, another war will start. Not a war that US or Israel or Iran stand a chance of winning. Oil is running out in quite a few places in the world. These three countries will face the wrath of the whole world: freezing and even seizing of their assets, sanctions, refusal to trade... Stretch it a bit further into the following month and they will consider military action. Trump is trying to offload blame onto Iran. He will say he offered them a great deal and they still decided to cut the supply through Hormuz.
It is better for them to send someone and try for peace. Better for the 3 of them. And better for us all.
  1. Iran can request reparations at this stage, as they did not start this war. But if the lack of free shipping through the Strait enters a stage where people starve and die due to this, in mass, they may find themselves paying reparations instead.

8 billion people is much much much more important that this useless, crazy, dangerous and improvised war. And we better stop here.

  1. It is not in Iran"s interest, well not in the interests of their ruling elite, their interest now is wrecking the global economy, the recent attacks have given them the green light to do this and by "taking out" established leaders it seems that more extreme versions have taken their place? The only downside for them is that when you are on the IDF shit-list things tend to end in a large cloud of dust.
Boolabus · 26/03/2026 13:54

Twiglets1 · 26/03/2026 09:14

How is Starmer slaughtering Christians?

Time consuming it may be but also a figment of your imagination.

It was pretty obvious they are referring to the current Syrian leader. So no need for your belittling reply

KeepPumping · 26/03/2026 15:59

He is talking now, saying that "taking control of Iran"s oil" is "an option", it feels like they don"t really know what they are doing and are just trying to keep the presentation tight and say they are winning, this could escalate very badly IMO.

KeepPumping · 26/03/2026 16:03

Their press conferences are getting more and more like the restaurant scene in Goodfellas, this is not filling me with confidence, there are elements in the ME just giddy with delight at the moment that we are being drawn in (again) he doesn"t seem to get this?

JaneJeffer · 26/03/2026 16:08

He’s bonkers

KeepPumping · 26/03/2026 16:15

A lot of the narrative seems rambling and inconsistent, Iran have prepared for this for decades, they will be watching markets and just revelling in the power they have at the moment.

MushMonster · 26/03/2026 16:51

KeepPumping · 26/03/2026 13:23

  1. It is not in Iran"s interest, well not in the interests of their ruling elite, their interest now is wrecking the global economy, the recent attacks have given them the green light to do this and by "taking out" established leaders it seems that more extreme versions have taken their place? The only downside for them is that when you are on the IDF shit-list things tend to end in a large cloud of dust.

You have a point, it may not be what the new rulers of Iran consider on their interest. But yes on the Iranian people and nation interest. Which are not neccesary the same, sadly.
I hope is posing, but the mediators are getting to break through to them.

MushMonster · 26/03/2026 16:58

Trump surely talks a lot!
Iran has given him a present.. the Guardian reports that letting some tankers through Hormuz today is the present or at least, part of it, or that Iran has coceded this as a present.
Mind you, some flags are passing through safely and, reportedly, for free. So a partial solution would be to ship as much as possible under those flags, after some diplomacy talks.
News are reporting this widely diffetently. From following each of Trumps little jewels, to full on plain refusal of the deal by Iran.
They surely like to keep us guessing!
Fingers crossed!

KeepPumping · 26/03/2026 17:02

MushMonster · 26/03/2026 16:51

You have a point, it may not be what the new rulers of Iran consider on their interest. But yes on the Iranian people and nation interest. Which are not neccesary the same, sadly.
I hope is posing, but the mediators are getting to break through to them.

My feeling is that there will be a big escalation soon with the aim of saying "mission accomplished" then Iran is going to go all out on water/energy infrastructure across the Gulf drawing the region into conflict, the press conferences telegraph loud and clear that this is 70% bluster and 30% planning, I think they thought the regime would fall after the first strikes, the more they bomb and Iran continues to retaliate the more they encourage people to rally against the West.

Twiglets1 · 26/03/2026 17:06

MushMonster · 26/03/2026 16:58

Trump surely talks a lot!
Iran has given him a present.. the Guardian reports that letting some tankers through Hormuz today is the present or at least, part of it, or that Iran has coceded this as a present.
Mind you, some flags are passing through safely and, reportedly, for free. So a partial solution would be to ship as much as possible under those flags, after some diplomacy talks.
News are reporting this widely diffetently. From following each of Trumps little jewels, to full on plain refusal of the deal by Iran.
They surely like to keep us guessing!
Fingers crossed!

Trump claims that Iran allowed 10 oil tankers to pass through the Strait of Hormuz as a “present” to show it was serious about negotiations to end the war.

MushMonster · 26/03/2026 17:07

KeepPumping · 26/03/2026 17:02

My feeling is that there will be a big escalation soon with the aim of saying "mission accomplished" then Iran is going to go all out on water/energy infrastructure across the Gulf drawing the region into conflict, the press conferences telegraph loud and clear that this is 70% bluster and 30% planning, I think they thought the regime would fall after the first strikes, the more they bomb and Iran continues to retaliate the more they encourage people to rally against the West.

I really hope not. But it is a possibility, sadly.
It realky brings to the front the question of why and how we choose these people to represent whole countries, when they are this stupid.

MushMonster · 26/03/2026 17:12

Twiglets1 · 26/03/2026 17:06

Trump claims that Iran allowed 10 oil tankers to pass through the Strait of Hormuz as a “present” to show it was serious about negotiations to end the war.

10 tankers is better than none. We still need many many more.
To be honest, I am not sure even the guys themselves know what they are doing or saying at this point.

Glad to hear Abbas Aragchi (Iran foreign minister) is not in the "to be killed" list anymore, because who are they going to talk to if they have no one willing to travel abroad to meet them or to risk to give their location by phone call or similar? They do need to keep some diplomats and contacts available and to turn up at Islamabad or any other chosen tocation. I think.

MushMonster · 26/03/2026 17:14

For context, it looks like we are ten folds down. Google tells me that 100 or more ships used to pass through Hormuz daily.

Twiglets1 · 26/03/2026 17:14

MushMonster · 26/03/2026 17:12

10 tankers is better than none. We still need many many more.
To be honest, I am not sure even the guys themselves know what they are doing or saying at this point.

Glad to hear Abbas Aragchi (Iran foreign minister) is not in the "to be killed" list anymore, because who are they going to talk to if they have no one willing to travel abroad to meet them or to risk to give their location by phone call or similar? They do need to keep some diplomats and contacts available and to turn up at Islamabad or any other chosen tocation. I think.

I think the fact they have taken Abbas Aragchi off the kill list is a strong hint about who is doing the negotiations from the Iran side.

Twiglets1 · 26/03/2026 17:15

(the negotiations that aren't happening from Iran's side of course😉)

MushMonster · 26/03/2026 17:24

I do not know twiglets. I am not infering any cracks between the bodies of the Islamic Republic here. It could be that PM and ministers are taking a more reasonable and peaceful approach than the IRGC and rest of the army or it could be that they are all in good agreement. No idea.
But if there are to be serious negotiations at any point, Aragchi will be there, right?

MushMonster · 26/03/2026 17:26

I am positive they are talking, because Pakistan has confirmed to be mediating ( I think there is another country helping, maybe Turkye?)
That is the only reason why I buy it.

( that is how untrustworthy Trump has become!)

Twiglets1 · 26/03/2026 17:39

MushMonster · 26/03/2026 17:26

I am positive they are talking, because Pakistan has confirmed to be mediating ( I think there is another country helping, maybe Turkye?)
That is the only reason why I buy it.

( that is how untrustworthy Trump has become!)

Yes I buy it also because of what Pakistan and Turkey have said re mediating.

Aragchi seems to be a main negotiator as far as I can tell.

KeepPumping · 26/03/2026 18:01

MushMonster · 26/03/2026 17:07

I really hope not. But it is a possibility, sadly.
It realky brings to the front the question of why and how we choose these people to represent whole countries, when they are this stupid.

The election battle cry was - We are going to bring factories back to your FlyOver/Rust Belt town! Of course people went for that after being ignored for so long as BigCorp and BigBank conducted their "globalisation" experiments. This is a different level though because the egos of the people involved won"t be satisfied very much by bringing back a few factories that make jeans, they need bigger things, or maybe they genuinely thought they could do the Iranian people a favour?

KeepPumping · 26/03/2026 18:07

MushMonster · 26/03/2026 17:24

I do not know twiglets. I am not infering any cracks between the bodies of the Islamic Republic here. It could be that PM and ministers are taking a more reasonable and peaceful approach than the IRGC and rest of the army or it could be that they are all in good agreement. No idea.
But if there are to be serious negotiations at any point, Aragchi will be there, right?

Very interesting interview on Bloomberg just now with John Kirby, basically the vibe is growing stronger that some sort of Boots on the Ground (or some of it, Islands maybe) scheme is taking shape or has already been planned. He went into the massive logistics of military and observation assets that would be needed to effectively control the S of H, and frankly without the main allies joining in this isn"t going to happen, the reporter asked him if the administration were losing credibility as their presentation just isn"t consistent enough.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.