IDF bombs Nasser hospital and then bombs the rescue worker a second time.

[Kakeandkake]

It is so sickening that they continue to act with such impunity. The bombed the hospital killing four journalists and THEN struck a second time killing the rescue workers who were trying to retrieve the bodies of the dead and injured.

The genocide continues in plain sight.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp89rp48246o

Well when quoting the IDF you could perhaps preface it with the “the deeply unreliable idf says” or “the independently proven countless times over to have lied idf says” maybe you could recall how the idf lied about the aid workers they shot whose ambulance they buried? Which they denied until footage appeared to the contrary, we should all be careful about spreading misinformation

This is very sad about Mariam Dagga a photo journalist for AP who was one of the five reporters among the 22 people killed by the IDF at the hospital on Monday.

(In Haaretz)

Algeria's ambassador to the United Nations, his voice breaking and on the verge of tears, read a letter Wednesday to the U.N. Security Council that Dagga wrote days before she was killed.

It was addressed to her 13-year-old son, Gaith, who left Gaza at the start of the war to live with his father in the United Arab Emirates.

Holding up a photo of Dagga, Amar Bendjama called her "a young and beautiful mother" whose only weapon was a camera.

"Ghaith. You are the heart and soul of your mother," Bendjama quoted Dagga as writing. "When I die, I want you to pray for me, not to cry for me."

"I want you never, never to forget me. I did everything to keep you happy and safe and when you grow, when you marry, and when you have a daughter, name her Mariam after me."

Especially misinformation being used to cover up war crimes

I think it's enough that I say it's information from the IDF (which I do) - people can then make up their own minds whether they consider that a reliable source or not.

If people are going to repeat stuff that Hamas say then they should equally mention that it's according to Hamas, and others can make up their own minds about that.

I don’t see any people here quoting Hamas, just The Un, human rights watch, amnesty, the bbc,

It all looked a bit chaotic, sadly the crowd looked out of control.

It is always shocking to see scenes like this when there are coffins, I remember when Shiri Bibas and her 2 son's coffins were handed over the scene of merriment and a party atmosphere by the terrorists and the attendees was sickening.

Whatever 'side' anyone is on when there are bodies in coffins then quiet and respect should be observed.

What are you on about? Are you saying that sky news who uncovered IDF lies are repeating Hamas propoganda?

Where do they get their info from?!

”chaotic” is that what we call pall bearers being viciously beaten by armoured personnel?

As stated from independent organisations well used to investigating conflicting narratives and investigating human rights violations and war crimes?

Anyone who just repeats what Hamas say is repeating Hamas propaganda.

Earlier today @Alittlefeedbackwouldbenice said Of the 6 individuals named as militants, 5 Sky couldn't find evidence of terrorist/militant/Hamas involvement, and the 6th, who did have connections to Hamas or similar, was killed the day before, not in this strike.

That comes directly from the Hamas statement In a statement issued later on Tuesday, Hamas challenged the Israeli account of the hospital casualties, denying that any of the Palestinians killed were militants.
The Hamas government media office said in a statement that one of the six Palestinians who Israel alleged were militants was killed in al-Mawasi some distance from the hospital, and another was killed elsewhere at a different time.

Is it the fault of @Gloriia that pall bearers were viciously beaten - No.

So there is really no need for your rude tone.

Are there any truly independent organisations? I doubt it, every one seems to take a side in this war it's just that some make the effort to at least appear impartial whereas others like Al Jazeera say don't bother.

As above @Alittlefeedbackwouldbenice this morning quoted from Sky who in turn were just quoting from the Hamas statement.

Keep repeating the lies even when they have been proven to be lies, eventually people move on, but how to live with justifying war crimes and the killing of innocent civilians, that must be hard

You've decided it's a war crime without even knowing all the facts. You have no idea if the camera was being used by Hamas operatives or not for surveillance purposes or whether there were 6 Hamas militants targeted and killed in the blast or not. You've just decided the IDF must be lying and are choosing to believe instead the Hamas version of events.

Good job you're not on Jury service, eh?

You seem to think even Sky news has anti-Israel bias so I can't take your views on impartiality seriously.

Well Sky news did just repeat the Hamas statement as though it were fact so that does bring it's impartiality into question.

It wasn't rude.

Gloriia was minimising the IDF's disgraceful actions where they were attacking pall bearers.

Keep in mind the IDF for a very long time lied (no surprise) that they killed this journalist after there was international outrage.

It was quite awhile later in the irrefutable evidence that they admitted it was them.

Be honest did you read the article?

Yes it was rude.

Gloria was not minimising anything, she specifically said Whatever 'side' anyone is on when there are bodies in coffins then quiet and respect should be observed.

I don’t think a camera, Hamas or not, justifies a double tap strike on a hospital which has killed innocent civilians and journalists. We have all seen the footage,

Or do you just prefer to post snippets out of context. You have ignored everything else that Sky news said they found from their own research.

Its just going round in circles now.

Some people believe the proven liars which are the IDF and the completely biased right wing Israeli news channel 12 over independent main stream reporting.

How could they have done "their own research" that quickly when foreign journalists aren't even allowed into Gaza?

They used local sources to piece together what they think happened and did not admit that some of their information came directly from Hamas.