They are not being held as a bargaining tool. As I keep pointing out, they are being held on suspicion of committing crimes, and many of them have been convicted of crimes.
It may seem as if they are being used as a bargaining tool, if you subscribe to that Hamas viewpoint. But they were not taken with that specific intent. Unlike the Israeli hostages.
I've no problem condemning Israel where I believe it's right to do so. Why are you questioning why I don't condemn them when I've repeatedly in this thread said that holding people especially children without charge for long amounts of time is morally indefensible?
Its like debating with ghosts here. Your'e saying im refusing to do something ive repeatly, very visibly done. Im vocal in my abhorrence for the extremist right wing element in current Israeli administration, and about the inhumanity of the aid blockage ( yes I'm aware it's not a blockage quite, but in my view it amounts to the same and is again morally indefensible and amounts to crimes against humanity ).
In this instance, im just asking that the word hostage just not be used incorrectly. Again, because it both harms the argument againstst administrative detention and builds hatred for Israel.
Just use the correct terms please?