Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East
Thread gallery
36
stillhiding1990 · 24/08/2025 10:30

PinkBobby · 24/08/2025 10:21

Not a fan of innocent children?

You not a fan of gay people/women’s rights/democracy?

Lolapusht · 24/08/2025 10:31

SaltAirAndTheRust · 24/08/2025 10:26

There is no evidence of Hamas stealing aid.

Do you think there is evidence of aid being stolen?

Stolen by whom is perhaps irrelevant as it still has the same effect.

SaltAirAndTheRust · 24/08/2025 10:32

Lolapusht · 24/08/2025 10:31

Do you think there is evidence of aid being stolen?

Stolen by whom is perhaps irrelevant as it still has the same effect.

There is verified evidence of Israel blocking aid.

OP posts:
SharonEllis · 24/08/2025 10:33

SaltAirAndTheRust · 24/08/2025 10:04

Oh dear. Go and educate yourself on the division of Germany and the Marshall Plan, which directed $1.4 billion to west Germany to rebuild, as well as directing funds to London to rebuild. Funnily enough, we helped rebuild the country that had been our enemies in the war because we recognised that the citizens of that country didn’t deserve to live in utter devastation.

It was rather more mercenary than that, but obviously dressed up as idealism, and the money came from America.

SaltAirAndTheRust · 24/08/2025 10:35

SharonEllis · 24/08/2025 10:33

It was rather more mercenary than that, but obviously dressed up as idealism, and the money came from America.

The aid came from all over Europe, mainly from the allied powers.

OP posts:
Lolapusht · 24/08/2025 10:35

PinkBobby · 24/08/2025 10:14

Hamas are responsible as the government of Gaza but if Israel is ‘saving Palestinians from Hamas’ with the aim of completely destroying Hamas, then there is a vacuum of power and someone needs to step in. The best people to step in and continue to ‘save’ the Palestinian people are the Israeli’s if long term peace is the aim. Help them rebuild, help them mourn their losses, help the sick recover, help them not be radicalised. I believe this is the best way for Israel to lessen the threat of extremism staying in Gaza. I’m not sure if it’s already too late for that though as there are already a lot of people who have lost everything whilst being told they are not suffering.

Also, Israel has chosen to access the tunnels under Gaza by flattening all the infrastructure. They clear it away with bulldozers and then start investigating the tunnels. Only time will tell whether the scale of destruction was truly necessary. In any case, I think if you choose to flatten a whole country as a way to access underground tunnels (rather than bombing to kill Hamas itself) and then control the flow of aid as Israel has, you have to take responsibility for the aftermath to a certain extent.

This isn’t only Israel’s responsibility but for them to throw their hand up and turn a blind eye will only lead to more hatred, more extremism and more pain for Palestinians and Israelis.

Edited

Sorry, can I just confirm, you want Israel to fully occupy and control Gaza?

I had taken from your posts that you are on the pro-Palestine side but I must have been confused 🤔

SharonEllis · 24/08/2025 10:35

Thegreyhound · 24/08/2025 10:15

I for one am not taking any lectures on what is or isn’t reprehensible, false equivalence, or disgustingness from any cheerleader for the Israeli government.

Great. Please go and direct that at a cheerleader for the Israeli government, which I am not and never have been. I am a cheerleader for accuracy and reasonable discussion but that's pissing in the wind on here.

I do think ordinary Palestinians deserve better friends.

UserOfDifferentNames · 24/08/2025 10:36

Lolapusht · 24/08/2025 10:21

Oh, thought of another one!

The suggestion that the women of Gaza have been forced to have babies during a war is horrific. Throughout this war, a disturbing theme has been expressed where Palestinians are somehow seen as lacking autonomy and are lesser. They can’t be expected not to resort to violence to solve problems, they can’t be expected to look after their own people and now the rather eye-opening all pregnancies are the result of force.

To that poster, which is it? Are Palestininas choosing to get pregnant during a war (or what, too uneducated to understand not to have sex if you don’t want to get pregnant) or are they all results of assault? Neither is particularly complimentary from a poster who would, I assume, claim to be pro-Palestine.

They are getting pregnant as in Yasser Arafat’s words ‘the womb of the Palestinian woman, is the strongest weapon’.

In a war like this, it is also helpful to have as many pregnant women and babies as possible to use for propaganda purposes, not great for the women and babies themselves though but I doubt the women have much of a say in it. There are no laws for marital rape or domestic violence in the State of Palestine which I assume includes Gaza and the West Bank.

https://www.newarab.com/features/how-palestinian-women-are-womb-national-project?amp

www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/migration/arabstates/Palestine.Summary.19.Eng.pdf

Wombs of the revolution: Palestinian women s contribution to the national project

An indispensable force in the drive for liberation, Palestinian women's contribution to the political and social resistance against Israel's occupation is ever-present. Yet, pervading ideas about masculinity in Palestine have hampered their efforts.

https://www.newarab.com/features/how-palestinian-women-are-womb-national-project?amp=

Lolapusht · 24/08/2025 10:36

SaltAirAndTheRust · 24/08/2025 10:32

There is verified evidence of Israel blocking aid.

Again, not the question.

Do you think that any of the aid that has made it in to Gaza has been stolen before it could be distributed as intended?

Lolapusht · 24/08/2025 10:38

UserOfDifferentNames · 24/08/2025 10:36

They are getting pregnant as in Yasser Arafat’s words ‘the womb of the Palestinian woman, is the strongest weapon’.

In a war like this, it is also helpful to have as many pregnant women and babies as possible to use for propaganda purposes, not great for the women and babies themselves though but I doubt the women have much of a say in it. There are no laws for marital rape or domestic violence in the State of Palestine which I assume includes Gaza and the West Bank.

https://www.newarab.com/features/how-palestinian-women-are-womb-national-project?amp

www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/migration/arabstates/Palestine.Summary.19.Eng.pdf

Another example of how the reality of the region is somewhat different to what its supporters in the west think it is…

TulipLavender · 24/08/2025 10:39

stillhiding1990 · 24/08/2025 10:28

Also no one replies to my question about why Palestine rejected offers of becoming a state? The replies I have had skirt around that and focus on distinguishing between Hamas and Palestine 😂

Because its Israeli Hasbara and not true.

Despite the illegality of Zionist colonialism, the PLO accepted the two-state solution in 1988, as did all the Palestinian political parties, including Hamas.

This can help educate you about what happened with the Oslo Accords and other peace negotiations:

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/3a6O-ZeW5zQ?si=j-lPnk5A18AHQ5mQ

Lolapusht · 24/08/2025 10:48

Ah, so since 1988 everything has been Israel’s fault and this is all justified? Which bit of the Zionist colonisation is illegal?

SaltAirAndTheRust · 24/08/2025 10:50

Lolapusht · 24/08/2025 10:48

Ah, so since 1988 everything has been Israel’s fault and this is all justified? Which bit of the Zionist colonisation is illegal?

1. Acquisition of Territory by Force

Law: UN Charter (Article 2(4)) and Customary International Law
Why Illegal: States cannot acquire territory through war or force. The 1967 Six-Day War led to Israel occupying the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza. The UN has repeatedly affirmed these are occupied territories.

2. Settlements in Occupied Territory

Law: Fourth Geneva Convention (1949), Article 49(6)
Why Illegal: An occupying power cannot transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.
Application: Israel’s settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem is considered a direct violation of this article.
UN Stance: UN Security Council Resolution 2334 (2016) explicitly calls Israeli settlements “a flagrant violation under international law.”

3. Annexation of East Jerusalem and Other Lands

Law: UN Charter, UNSC Resolutions 242 (1967) & 478 (1980)
Why Illegal: Annexation of occupied territory is prohibited. Israel’s 1980 declaration of Jerusalem as its “eternal and undivided capital” was declared null and void by the UN Security Council.

4. Displacement of the Palestinian Population

Law: Fourth Geneva Convention, Article 49(1)
Why Illegal: Forcible transfer or displacement of protected persons in occupied territory is prohibited.
Application: Evictions in East Jerusalem (e.g., Sheikh Jarrah) and demolitions of Palestinian homes have been widely condemned as unlawful.

5. Denial of Self-Determination

Law: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, Article 1), UNGA Resolution 1514 (1960)
Why Illegal: The Palestinian people have a recognized right to self-determination. Occupation and settlement policies are considered to obstruct this right.

6. Blockade and Collective Punishment (Gaza)

Law: Fourth Geneva Convention (Article 33), Customary IHL
Why Illegal: Collective punishment of a civilian population is prohibited. The UN and major human rights organizations argue that Israel’s blockade of Gaza amounts to unlawful collective punishment.

OP posts:
Twiglets1 · 24/08/2025 10:51

Lolapusht · 24/08/2025 10:35

Sorry, can I just confirm, you want Israel to fully occupy and control Gaza?

I had taken from your posts that you are on the pro-Palestine side but I must have been confused 🤔

I think @PinkBobby is confused.

They are calling for Israel to "step in" to occupy and control Gaza after the war but would no doubt be joining in with the vocal criticisms of them if they did just that.

Netanyahu himself has explicitly stated that his goal is not to occupy Gaza but rather to hand over control of Gaza to unnamed “Arab forces.”

This plan seems to have widespread support, including from Mosab Hassan Yousef, son of Sheikh Hassan Yousef, the founder of Hamas.

“When I see the moral decay within the Muslim population, the slaughter of toddlers, kidnapping of Holocaust survivors, of innocent civilians who were actually mostly pro two-state solution, I feel we have betrayed them,” he continued.

In lieu of a Palestinian state, Yousef suggested an Arab federation and cooperation with the State of Israel.

www.jns.org/hamas-death-culture-beyond-comprehension-says-founders-son/

PinkBobby · 24/08/2025 10:52

Lolapusht · 24/08/2025 10:35

Sorry, can I just confirm, you want Israel to fully occupy and control Gaza?

I had taken from your posts that you are on the pro-Palestine side but I must have been confused 🤔

Oh absolutely not. My response, I suppose, is some dream situation where the Israeli gov genuinely has the Palestinian people’s interests at heart. All evidence suggest this is not the case. I think Israel should help rebuild Gaza after the harm they have done but any help Israel should or could provide would be, in my eyes, pointless if the aim isn’t to create a safe, independent Palestinian state that doesn’t rely on Israel for its economy or ongoing infrastructure.

Sadly, I think Israel (in its current form government wise) aim to take control of Gaza (and potentially the West Bank eventually) and to rebuild it for Israeli settlers not for Palestinians. I base this on things that the Israeli government have said and the renewed push for large settler development in the WB.

Twiglets1 · 24/08/2025 10:55

PinkBobby · 24/08/2025 10:52

Oh absolutely not. My response, I suppose, is some dream situation where the Israeli gov genuinely has the Palestinian people’s interests at heart. All evidence suggest this is not the case. I think Israel should help rebuild Gaza after the harm they have done but any help Israel should or could provide would be, in my eyes, pointless if the aim isn’t to create a safe, independent Palestinian state that doesn’t rely on Israel for its economy or ongoing infrastructure.

Sadly, I think Israel (in its current form government wise) aim to take control of Gaza (and potentially the West Bank eventually) and to rebuild it for Israeli settlers not for Palestinians. I base this on things that the Israeli government have said and the renewed push for large settler development in the WB.

I think Israel (in its current form government wise) aim to take control of Gaza ... I base this on things that the Israeli government have said

Certain extremist elements within the Israel government have said this but not Netanyahu and he is the one in charge.

PinkBobby · 24/08/2025 10:58

Twiglets1 · 24/08/2025 10:55

I think Israel (in its current form government wise) aim to take control of Gaza ... I base this on things that the Israeli government have said

Certain extremist elements within the Israel government have said this but not Netanyahu and he is the one in charge.

But his hands are tied by those very extremists. If they walk, he loses control. It is frustrating but they have such disproportionate power. It’s very worrying.

TulipLavender · 24/08/2025 11:01

Lolapusht · 24/08/2025 10:48

Ah, so since 1988 everything has been Israel’s fault and this is all justified? Which bit of the Zionist colonisation is illegal?

All of the settlements and the military blockade of Gaza.

UserOfDifferentNames · 24/08/2025 11:04

TulipLavender · 24/08/2025 10:39

Because its Israeli Hasbara and not true.

Despite the illegality of Zionist colonialism, the PLO accepted the two-state solution in 1988, as did all the Palestinian political parties, including Hamas.

This can help educate you about what happened with the Oslo Accords and other peace negotiations:

Illegal according to who?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Remo_conference

It was effectively decolonisation, not colonisation, as the Jewish people returned to their ancestral land.

San Remo conference - Wikipedia

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Remo_conference

UserOfDifferentNames · 24/08/2025 11:10

PinkBobby · 24/08/2025 10:58

But his hands are tied by those very extremists. If they walk, he loses control. It is frustrating but they have such disproportionate power. It’s very worrying.

Netanyahu has clearly said Israel’s goal is not to occupy Gaza but to free Gaza from Hamas.

https://x.com/netanyahu/status/1954560505953042568

https://x.com/netanyahu/status/1954560505953042568

SaltAirAndTheRust · 24/08/2025 11:13

UserOfDifferentNames · 24/08/2025 11:04

Illegal according to who?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Remo_conference

It was effectively decolonisation, not colonisation, as the Jewish people returned to their ancestral land.

This has been addressed.

  1. Acquisition of Territory by Force
Law: UN Charter (Article 2(4)) and Customary International Law Why Illegal: States cannot acquire territory through war or force. The 1967 Six-Day War led to Israel occupying the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza. The UN has repeatedly affirmed these are occupied territories.
  1. Settlements in Occupied Territory
Law: Fourth Geneva Convention (1949), Article 49(6) Why Illegal: An occupying power cannot transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies. Application: Israel’s settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem is considered a direct violation of this article. UN Stance: UN Security Council Resolution 2334 (2016) explicitly calls Israeli settlements “a flagrant violation under international law.”
  1. Annexation of East Jerusalem and Other Lands
Law: UN Charter, UNSC Resolutions 242 (1967) & 478 (1980) Why Illegal: Annexation of occupied territory is prohibited. Israel’s 1980 declaration of Jerusalem as its “eternal and undivided capital” was declared null and void by the UN Security Council.
  1. Displacement of the Palestinian Population
Law: Fourth Geneva Convention, Article 49(1) Why Illegal: Forcible transfer or displacement of protected persons in occupied territory is prohibited. Application: Evictions in East Jerusalem (e.g., Sheikh Jarrah) and demolitions of Palestinian homes have been widely condemned as unlawful.
  1. Denial of Self-Determination
Law: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, Article 1), UNGA Resolution 1514 (1960) Why Illegal: The Palestinian people have a recognized right to self-determination. Occupation and settlement policies are considered to obstruct this right.
  1. Blockade and Collective Punishment (Gaza)
Law: Fourth Geneva Convention (Article 33), Customary IHL Why Illegal: Collective punishment of a civilian population is prohibited. The UN and major human rights organizations argue that Israel’s blockade of Gaza amounts to unlawful collective punishment.
OP posts:
PinkBobby · 24/08/2025 11:13

UserOfDifferentNames · 24/08/2025 11:10

Netanyahu has clearly said Israel’s goal is not to occupy Gaza but to free Gaza from Hamas.

https://x.com/netanyahu/status/1954560505953042568

He also says there is no famine or starvation in Gaza.

Twiglets1 · 24/08/2025 11:13

PinkBobby · 24/08/2025 10:58

But his hands are tied by those very extremists. If they walk, he loses control. It is frustrating but they have such disproportionate power. It’s very worrying.

They have a lot of licence to mouth off with their unpalatable opinions, it seems.

But Netanyahu presumably wants to win another election so he has to be more moderate. Even so he is likely to lose the next election in Israel in 2026.

Plus I think he would be relieved for other countries to have responsibility for running Gaza. It would just be an ongoing headache for him where realistically he would his leadership would never be accepted. Far easier for others to do it who are seen as more neutral.

TulipLavender · 24/08/2025 11:14

UserOfDifferentNames · 24/08/2025 11:04

Illegal according to who?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Remo_conference

It was effectively decolonisation, not colonisation, as the Jewish people returned to their ancestral land.

Please see SaltandRusts 10.50 response above - sets the illegality out very clearly.

Even the early Zionists were clear about the nature of Zionism as settler colonialism, describing their project as such and engaging with other colonial powers for expansion.

Theodore Herzl explicitly viewed it as a colonial venture, writing to Cecil Rhodes about the need for colonial expansion and discreetly carrying out the "expropriation and removal of the poor". Other early Zionists, like Nordau and Jabatinsky also used the term "colonization" to describe their goals in Palestine.

Ilan Pappe, Israeli Historian, sets out clearly the interesting origin of Zionism in his book, Lobbying for Zionism.

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/HSD6s61grck?si=oO5I_YDxrQvn4i6C

Vivi0 · 24/08/2025 11:15

SaltAirAndTheRust · 24/08/2025 10:50

1. Acquisition of Territory by Force

Law: UN Charter (Article 2(4)) and Customary International Law
Why Illegal: States cannot acquire territory through war or force. The 1967 Six-Day War led to Israel occupying the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza. The UN has repeatedly affirmed these are occupied territories.

2. Settlements in Occupied Territory

Law: Fourth Geneva Convention (1949), Article 49(6)
Why Illegal: An occupying power cannot transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.
Application: Israel’s settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem is considered a direct violation of this article.
UN Stance: UN Security Council Resolution 2334 (2016) explicitly calls Israeli settlements “a flagrant violation under international law.”

3. Annexation of East Jerusalem and Other Lands

Law: UN Charter, UNSC Resolutions 242 (1967) & 478 (1980)
Why Illegal: Annexation of occupied territory is prohibited. Israel’s 1980 declaration of Jerusalem as its “eternal and undivided capital” was declared null and void by the UN Security Council.

4. Displacement of the Palestinian Population

Law: Fourth Geneva Convention, Article 49(1)
Why Illegal: Forcible transfer or displacement of protected persons in occupied territory is prohibited.
Application: Evictions in East Jerusalem (e.g., Sheikh Jarrah) and demolitions of Palestinian homes have been widely condemned as unlawful.

5. Denial of Self-Determination

Law: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR, Article 1), UNGA Resolution 1514 (1960)
Why Illegal: The Palestinian people have a recognized right to self-determination. Occupation and settlement policies are considered to obstruct this right.

6. Blockade and Collective Punishment (Gaza)

Law: Fourth Geneva Convention (Article 33), Customary IHL
Why Illegal: Collective punishment of a civilian population is prohibited. The UN and major human rights organizations argue that Israel’s blockade of Gaza amounts to unlawful collective punishment.

Wow. You put that response together rather quickly. You drafted this post in less than 2 minutes.

impressive.

But it would be nice if people could at least try to engage with threads beyond copying and pasting, posting links, posting YouTube videos, calling others “genocide defenders/deniers” (what a joke that one is), engaging in conspiracy and outright lying to themselves and others about the meaning of words.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread