How long do you think you are going to get away with accusing individual posters of certain motivations because unlike you, they are not prepared to throw away common sense and intellect in order to try and " win" debates?
So shallow is your faith in your own stand, you make up narratives then accuse others of doing the same because their correct definition of things appear to be too banal for the dramatic, yet monochrome prism through which your vision of even words are viewed.
Instead of accusing posters of malignant motivations, what are YOUR motivations for posting?
Is it to police the CITME threads, to make sure no shard of sunlight penetrates your bargain bucket Maoist thought speak?
Or is your stand so fragile that even world recognised thought and definitions of words and simple dynamics , the action/ reaction equation have to be rewritten as if Foucault himself had instructed you to break down what is commonly understood?
And just for the sake of doing so, whilst claiming moral superiority, whilst doing your level best to try and distress people who do not see your chaoticly refined circularity coming.
It's not that you care, is it? To care takes effort. You just need to seem better than those who do care, but do not have the pathology of force teaming themselves with a paranoid finger pointing hall monitor persona.
You do know it's 2025 and not Year Zero?
And that the word is Pravda, not Prada?