What’s one-sided is 90% of the casualties being Palestinians. What’s one-sided is tanks and fighter jets against refugee camps. Asking for basic human rights isn’t bias, it’s the bare minimum.
The idea that pointing to October 7th justifies starving 2 million people, denying baby formula to newborns, and burying tens of thousands under rubble is not self-defence. It’s collective punishment and it’s illegal.
Yes, Hamas has committed atrocities. No, that doesn’t give Israel a free pass to bomb refugee camps, shoot civilians trying to collect aid, or block food, water, and medicine from entering Gaza. International law doesn’t say “if they’re bad, you get to be too.”
There are viable solutions. Ceasefire. Hostage exchange. Humanitarian access. War crimes investigations on all sides. Those calling for that aren’t ignoring Israeli suffering, they’re just refusing to pretend that mass death is a path to justice.
What’s truly “one-sided” here HUN is the death toll. Tens of thousands of Palestinians killed (over 70% women and children). Aid sites attacked. Journalists and doctors targeted. Entire neighbourhoods wiped off the map. If 1,200 Israeli deaths must never be forgotten, why are 40,000 Palestinian ones treated as acceptable losses?
You want security? You don’t get it by creating more orphans and corpses. Safety doesn’t come from siege. It comes from justice.
And no, sharing images of bombed toddlers or starving infants isn’t the problem. The problem is what caused those images to exist.
If your only answer is “but Hamas,” then ask yourself why so many of your arguments collapse the second we start talking about dead children.